From: Roman Mamedov <rm@romanrm.net>
To: Daniel Brady <drbrady@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Chunk root problem
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2017 10:48:17 +0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170707104817.3e2b6273@natsu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABRvOkNWpaKB=mAEF9UvUUveFLBQroTWLpC5H=Fqc+okQ_BU3Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 5 Jul 2017 22:10:35 -0600
Daniel Brady <drbrady@gmail.com> wrote:
> parent transid verify failed
Typically in Btrfs terms this means "you're screwed", fsck will not fix it, and
nobody will know how to fix or what is the cause either. Time to restore from
backups! Or look into "btrfs restore" if you don't have any.
In your case it's especially puzzling as the difference in transid numbers is
really significant (about 100K), almost like the FS was operating for months
without updating some parts of itself -- and no checksum errors either, so
all looks correct, except that everything is horribly wrong.
This kind of error seems to occur more often in RAID setups, either Btrfs
native RAID, or with Btrfs on top of other RAID setups -- i.e. where it
becomes a complex issue that all writes to multi devices DO complete IN order,
in case of an unclean shutdown. (which is much simpler on a single device FS).
Also one of your disks or cables is failing (was /dev/sde on that boot, but may
get a different index next boot), check SMART data for it and replace.
> [ 21.230919] BTRFS info (device sdf): bdev /dev/sde errs: wr 402545, rd
> 234683174, flush 194501, corrupt 0, gen 0
--
With respect,
Roman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-07 5:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-06 4:10 Chunk root problem Daniel Brady
2017-07-06 9:26 ` Duncan
2017-07-07 5:48 ` Roman Mamedov [this message]
2017-07-07 7:06 ` Daniel Brady
2017-07-10 4:21 ` Daniel Brady
2017-07-10 12:59 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-07-07 6:08 Daniel Brady
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170707104817.3e2b6273@natsu \
--to=rm@romanrm.net \
--cc=drbrady@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.