From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 430B8E00B8B; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 12:24:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [198.47.19.16 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from fllnx209.ext.ti.com (fllnx209.ext.ti.com [198.47.19.16]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA6CDE00B8B for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 12:24:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dflxv15.itg.ti.com ([128.247.5.124]) by fllnx209.ext.ti.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTP id v6AJO1AP010353 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 14:24:01 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1499714641; bh=PHsQpzoUc+ZPUl1/egQFdnCdK9/zAwlyTNf/qN1Zx/c=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=UKjvKWShZtuZ+TJqkvwR8wuLCKAEF+AUClOIa6jFTnFmgc715tuQ3dD8ct8h1sohb +EchSNJERFJoqzrNKzwfFDNNNPn8R9lRCXwXXlq8PqU2Wm2UVXgfyoGNH21DLywOid N9fXYBN1zreejSuzhyk7CK2185STC8uE3T/vlLg4= Received: from DLEE70.ent.ti.com (dlee70.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.113]) by dflxv15.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v6AJNula003043 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 14:23:56 -0500 Received: from dflp32.itg.ti.com (10.64.6.15) by DLEE70.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.113) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.294.0; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 14:23:55 -0500 Received: from localhost (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by dflp32.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v6AJNtSt017782; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 14:23:55 -0500 Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 15:23:53 -0400 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: "Radhakrishnan, Mahesh" Message-ID: <20170710192353.GD14665@edge> References: <1499357178-23074-1-git-send-email-m-radhakrishnan2@ti.com> <5130E41A1BA9D145BA0F3B18D5CFB0A74379C51F@DFLE12.ent.ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5130E41A1BA9D145BA0F3B18D5CFB0A74379C51F@DFLE12.ent.ti.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: "meta-ti@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] ti-staging: Inhibiting sysroot strip & package debug split X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 19:24:14 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 05:26:54PM +0000, Radhakrishnan, Mahesh wrote: > The board module failed without this patch. > So, the references to ti-staging.inc needs to be removed from ALL the recipes? In many existing cases including this file is not even required at all! I started cleaning this up recently: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-ti/commit/?h=morty&id=7b51cf71bf4c51cc0aeff42c2d8a8522e37828ce http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-ti/commit/?h=morty&id=71f6beaa00039bf3add48fe0b42e100b01d81e45 http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-ti/commit/?h=morty&id=d3d5c5c5130ca2ac61e81dd39ccba8fe87e05a1c http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-ti/commit/?h=morty&id=f2cd25abd2f5912069f907d9ab7385be3935258b http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-ti/commit/?h=morty&id=d4e2ecba1a8c9445b31c9b68aeb5a6ca1ccc9580 In some cases that do need to set INHIBIT vars, those should be set in corresponding recipes on a case-by-case basis, i.e. not in bulk! -- Denys > -----Original Message----- > From: Pang, Ivan > Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 1:08 PM > To: Radhakrishnan, Mahesh; meta-ti@yoctoproject.org > Subject: RE: [meta-ti] [PATCH] ti-staging: Inhibiting sysroot strip & package debug split > > We had a previous discussion on this ti-staging.inc file and the conclusion is that removing this file is the better way going forward. > Are there specific recipes that needed this patch? > > -----Original Message----- > From: meta-ti-bounces@yoctoproject.org [mailto:meta-ti-bounces@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Radhakrishnan, Mahesh > Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 11:06 AM > To: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org > Subject: [meta-ti] [PATCH] ti-staging: Inhibiting sysroot strip & package debug split > > Signed-off-by: Mahesh Radhakrishnan > --- > recipes-ti/includes/ti-staging.inc | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/recipes-ti/includes/ti-staging.inc b/recipes-ti/includes/ti-staging.inc > index b588805..ae523ce 100644 > --- a/recipes-ti/includes/ti-staging.inc > +++ b/recipes-ti/includes/ti-staging.inc > @@ -1,4 +1,6 @@ > INHIBIT_PACKAGE_STRIP = "1" > +INHIBIT_SYSROOT_STRIP = "1" > +INHIBIT_PACKAGE_DEBUG_SPLIT = "1" > > ALLOW_EMPTY_${PN} = "1" > ALLOW_EMPTY_${PN}-dev = "1" > -- > 1.9.1 > > -- > _______________________________________________ > meta-ti mailing list > meta-ti@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti > -- > _______________________________________________ > meta-ti mailing list > meta-ti@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti