All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Okash Khawaja <okash.khawaja@gmail.com>
To: Alan Cox <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, William Hubbs <w.d.hubbs@gmail.com>,
	Chris Brannon <chris@the-brannons.com>,
	Kirk Reiser <kirk@reisers.ca>,
	speakup@linux-speakup.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [patch] staging: speakup: safely close tty
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 11:39:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170711103913.GA561@sanghar> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170710125544.2aa4d12a@alans-desktop>

Hi,

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 12:55:44PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Jul 2017 20:13:01 +0100
> Okash Khawaja <okash.khawaja@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Speakup opens tty using tty_open_by_driver. When closing, it calls
> > tty_ldisc_release but doesn't close and remove the tty itself. As a
> > result, that tty cannot then be opened from user space. This patch calls
> > tty_release_struct which ensures that tty is safely removed and freed
> > up. It also calls tty_ldisc_release, so speakup doesn't need to call it.
> > 
> > This patch also unregisters N_SPEAKUP. It is registered when a speakup
> > module is loaded.
> 
> What happens if after you register it someone assigns that ldisc to
> another tty as well ?
> 
> You should register the ldisc when the relevant module is initialized and
> release it only when the module is unloaded. That way the module ref
> counts will handle cases where someone uses the ldisc with something else.
Sorry if I misunderstood it. That's what we do here.
spk_ttyio_initialise_ldisc is called separately for each module (e.g.
speakup_apollo, speakup_ltlk etc) when it is loaded. spk_ttyio_release
is also called separately for each module when it is unloaded. The ldisc
stays around until the last of the modules is unloaded.

> 
> I'd also btw strongly recommend putting the ldisc and the speakup tty
> driver as different modules.
Sure, that makes sense. I will do that following these patches.

Thanks,
Okash

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-11 10:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-07 19:13 [patch] staging: speakup: safely close tty Okash Khawaja
2017-07-10 11:55 ` Alan Cox
2017-07-11 10:39   ` Okash Khawaja [this message]
2017-07-12 18:25     ` Alan Cox
2017-07-13 11:24       ` Okash Khawaja
2017-07-16  9:28       ` [patch v2 0/1] " Okash Khawaja
2017-07-16  9:28         ` [patch v2 1/1] " Okash Khawaja

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170711103913.GA561@sanghar \
    --to=okash.khawaja@gmail.com \
    --cc=chris@the-brannons.com \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kirk@reisers.ca \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org \
    --cc=speakup@linux-speakup.org \
    --cc=w.d.hubbs@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.