Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] PCID and improved laziness

[Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>]

On Fri, 30 Jun, at 01:44:22PM, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jun, at 08:53:12AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > *** Ingo, even if this misses 4.13, please apply the first patch before
> > *** the merge window.
> > 
> > There are three performance benefits here:
> > 
> > 1. TLB flushing is slow.  (I.e. the flush itself takes a while.)
> >    This avoids many of them when switching tasks by using PCID.  In
> >    a stupid little benchmark I did, it saves about 100ns on my laptop
> >    per context switch.  I'll try to improve that benchmark.
> > 
> > 2. Mms that have been used recently on a given CPU might get to keep
> >    their TLB entries alive across process switches with this patch
> >    set.  TLB fills are pretty fast on modern CPUs, but they're even
> >    faster when they don't happen.
> > 
> > 3. Lazy TLB is way better.  We used to do two stupid things when we
> >    ran kernel threads: we'd send IPIs to flush user contexts on their
> >    CPUs and then we'd write to CR3 for no particular reason as an excuse
> >    to stop further IPIs.  With this patch, we do neither.
> 
> Heads up, I'm gonna queue this for a run on SUSE's performance test
> grid.

FWIW, I didn't see any change in performance with this series on a
PCID-capable machine. On the plus side, I didn't see any weird-looking
bugs either.

Are your benchmarks available anywhere?

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>