All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] md: remove 'idx' from 'struct resync_pages'
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 09:41:33 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170713014132.GE670@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8737a1437y.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name>

On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 09:58:41AM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12 2017, Ming Lei wrote:
> 
> > bio_add_page() won't fail for resync bio, and the page index for each
> > bio is same, so remove it.
> >
> > More importantly the 'idx' of 'struct resync_pages' is initialized in
> > mempool allocator function, this way is wrong since mempool is only
> > responsible for allocation, we can't use that for initialization.
> >
> > Suggested-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
> > Reported-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
> > Fixes: f0250618361d(md: raid10: don't use bio's vec table to manage resync pages)
> > Fixes: 98d30c5812c3(md: raid1: don't use bio's vec table to manage resync pages)
> > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/md/md.h     | 1 -
> >  drivers/md/raid1.c  | 6 +++---
> >  drivers/md/raid10.c | 6 +++---
> >  3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/md/md.h b/drivers/md/md.h
> > index 991f0fe2dcc6..2c780aa8d07f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/md/md.h
> > +++ b/drivers/md/md.h
> > @@ -736,7 +736,6 @@ static inline void mddev_check_write_zeroes(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio
> >  
> >  /* for managing resync I/O pages */
> >  struct resync_pages {
> > -	unsigned	idx;	/* for get/put page from the pool */
> >  	void		*raid_bio;
> >  	struct page	*pages[RESYNC_PAGES];
> >  };
> > diff --git a/drivers/md/raid1.c b/drivers/md/raid1.c
> > index 3febfc8391fb..7901ddc3362f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/md/raid1.c
> > +++ b/drivers/md/raid1.c
> > @@ -170,7 +170,6 @@ static void * r1buf_pool_alloc(gfp_t gfp_flags, void *data)
> >  			resync_get_all_pages(rp);
> >  		}
> >  
> > -		rp->idx = 0;
> >  		rp->raid_bio = r1_bio;
> >  		bio->bi_private = rp;
> >  	}
> > @@ -2619,6 +2618,7 @@ static sector_t raid1_sync_request(struct mddev *mddev, sector_t sector_nr,
> >  	int good_sectors = RESYNC_SECTORS;
> >  	int min_bad = 0; /* number of sectors that are bad in all devices */
> >  	int idx = sector_to_idx(sector_nr);
> > +	int page_idx = 0;
> >  
> >  	if (!conf->r1buf_pool)
> >  		if (init_resync(conf))
> > @@ -2846,7 +2846,7 @@ static sector_t raid1_sync_request(struct mddev *mddev, sector_t sector_nr,
> >  			bio = r1_bio->bios[i];
> >  			rp = get_resync_pages(bio);
> >  			if (bio->bi_end_io) {
> > -				page = resync_fetch_page(rp, rp->idx++);
> > +				page = resync_fetch_page(rp, page_idx);
> >  
> >  				/*
> >  				 * won't fail because the vec table is big
> > @@ -2858,7 +2858,7 @@ static sector_t raid1_sync_request(struct mddev *mddev, sector_t sector_nr,
> >  		nr_sectors += len>>9;
> >  		sector_nr += len>>9;
> >  		sync_blocks -= (len>>9);
> > -	} while (get_resync_pages(r1_bio->bios[disk]->bi_private)->idx < RESYNC_PAGES);
> > +	} while (page_idx++ < RESYNC_PAGES);
> 
> I think you want ++page_idx < RESYNC_PAGES, otherwise there will be
> one pass through the loop where page_idx == RESYNC_PAGES

Good catch, thanks!

thanks, 
Ming

      reply	other threads:[~2017-07-13  1:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-12  8:28 [PATCH 1/2] md: remove 'idx' from 'struct resync_pages' Ming Lei
2017-07-12 23:58 ` NeilBrown
2017-07-12 23:58   ` NeilBrown
2017-07-13  1:41   ` Ming Lei [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170713014132.GE670@ming.t460p \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.com \
    --cc=shli@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.