From: "Bill O'Donnell" <billodo@redhat.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>, fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs/424: test xfs_db to ensure type size taken into account with new type
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 14:58:36 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170714195836.GA12339@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170714191101.GA28897@redhat.com>
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 02:11:01PM -0500, Bill O'Donnell wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 02:01:31PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 07/14/2017 11:47 AM, Bill O'Donnell wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 10:42:57AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> >
> >
> > >>> +# for different sector sizes, ensure no CRC errors are falsely reported
> > >>> +
> > >>> +# Supported types include: agf, agfl, agi, attr3, bmapbta,
> > >>> +# bmapbtd, bnobt, cntbt, data, dir3, dqblk, inobt, inodata,
> > >>> +# inode, log, rtbitmap, rtsummary, sb, symlink, text, finobt.
> > >>
> > >> This leaves me wondering why we don't test most of the above ;)
> > >>
> > >>> +# For various sector sizes, test some types that involve type size.
> > >>> +for SECTOR_SIZE in 512 1024 2048 4096; do
> > >>> + $MKFS_XFS_PROG -f -s size=$SECTOR_SIZE $SCRATCH_DEV > /dev/null
> > >>> + for TYPE in agf agi agfl sb; do
> > >>> + DADDR=`$XFS_DB_PROG -c "$TYPE" -c "daddr" $SCRATCH_DEV | _filter_dbval`
> > >>> + $XFS_DB_PROG -c "$TYPE" -c "daddr 42" -c "daddr $DADDR" -c "type $TYPE" $SCRATCH_DEV
> > >>
> > >> Hm is there a reason for the first "-c $TYPE" or even the "daddr 42" in the line just above?
> > > It's drawn from the reproducer test case.
> > > The first "-c $TYPE" sets the object, "daddr 42" is an arbitrary address set. Without
> > > the daddr change and change-back, the test will pass even without the recent xfs_db
> > > xfsprogs change.
> >
> > Really? Not here, xfsprogs-4.5.0 :
> >
> > # xfs_db -c "daddr 2" -c "type agi" fsfile
> > Metadata CRC error detected at xfs_agi block 0x2/0x200
>
> Ahh, ok, you're correct - I'll modify the test accordingly.
Wait. I still think the object has to get set with "-c $TYPE". If not
the crc error occurs even with the new xfs_db code:
# xfs_db -V
xfs_db version 4.12.0-rc2
# xfs_db /dev/sda6
xfs_db> daddr
current daddr is 0
xfs_db> daddr 2
xfs_db> type agi
Metadata CRC error detected at xfs_agi block 0x2/0x1000
Metadata CRC error detected at xfs_agi block 0x2/0x1000
And error is gone when the object is set and the daddr gets
set to the correct value.
[root@localhost xfsprogs-dev3]# xfs_db /dev/sda6
xfs_db> agi
xfs_db> daddr
current daddr is 16
xfs_db> daddr 2
xfs_db> daddr 16
xfs_db> type agi
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-14 19:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-12 18:31 [PATCH] xfs/424: test xfs_db to ensure sector size taken into account with new type Bill O'Donnell
2017-07-12 19:02 ` Eric Sandeen
2017-07-14 14:27 ` [PATCH] xfs/424: test xfs_db to ensure type " Bill O'Donnell
2017-07-14 15:42 ` Eric Sandeen
2017-07-14 16:47 ` Bill O'Donnell
2017-07-14 19:01 ` Eric Sandeen
2017-07-14 19:11 ` Bill O'Donnell
2017-07-14 19:58 ` Bill O'Donnell [this message]
2017-07-14 21:43 ` Eric Sandeen
2017-07-14 17:39 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-07-17 18:53 ` [PATCH v3] " Bill O'Donnell
2017-07-17 19:41 ` Eric Sandeen
2017-07-17 19:48 ` Bill O'Donnell
2017-07-17 20:23 ` Eric Sandeen
2017-07-17 22:09 ` [PATCH v4] " Bill O'Donnell
2017-07-20 4:08 ` Eryu Guan
2017-07-21 14:53 ` [PATCH v5] " Bill O'Donnell
2017-07-24 11:54 ` Eryu Guan
2017-07-24 15:00 ` Bill O'Donnell
2017-07-24 15:07 ` [PATCH v6] " Bill O'Donnell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170714195836.GA12339@redhat.com \
--to=billodo@redhat.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.