All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>,
	QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Status and RFC of patchew testings on QEMU
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 12:06:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170717110614.GK3640@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA9fzkk6mC+Bz4jNd+7M8nq0xpooVFDNeVb0VcqGDadB8Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 12:00:22PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 17 July 2017 at 11:20, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:
> > I'm a little concerned about the fact that we've now got three different
> > sets of tests that are being run on pull requests. There are the tests
> > that Peter runs on various combinations at time of merge, the tests run
> > by patchw at time of submissions, and the tests run by travis after
> > merge. Each of them is covering a different set of scenarios with only
> > partial overlap between them.
> 
> I agree -- I have my ad-hoc test system not because I enjoy
> collecting random things to run tests on but because we don't
> have an automated system that does what I need:
>  * wide coverage, focusing on oddball host architectures and OSes
>  * ability to ssh in to a machine where tests have broken if need be
>  * decently fast to complete a test run (travis is terrible for this)
> 
> Note that "fast to complete a test run for me" is in conflict with
> "usable by anybody who wants to submit a pull request" :-)

Not neccessarily. It does mean though that if we had an automated test
system, we would have to reserve some portion of hardware resources for
exclusively jobs triggered by the person responsible for git master and
stable branch merges, so that it can never get delayed by a backlog of
jobs from the mailing list.

OpenStack has this kind of CI system - they have 2 separate job queues,
one testing all patches submitted for code review, and one queue only
processing patches for merge, so the former can't negatively impact the
progress of the latter. Availability of (money/sponsorship for) hardware
though is an obvious limiting factor here.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-17 11:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-17  6:35 [Qemu-devel] Status and RFC of patchew testings on QEMU Fam Zheng
2017-07-17  9:05 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-07-17  9:28   ` Peter Maydell
2017-07-17  9:39     ` Fam Zheng
2017-07-17 10:06       ` Peter Maydell
2017-07-17 10:26         ` Daniel P. Berrange
2017-07-25  9:58           ` Peter Maydell
2017-07-27 11:03             ` Fam Zheng
2017-07-27 11:30               ` Gerd Hoffmann
2017-07-17 10:03   ` Daniel P. Berrange
2017-07-17  9:41 ` Thomas Huth
2017-07-17 10:20   ` Daniel P. Berrange
2017-07-17 11:00     ` Peter Maydell
2017-07-17 11:06       ` Daniel P. Berrange [this message]
2017-07-28  5:59     ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2017-07-17 23:17   ` Fam Zheng
2017-07-18  9:11     ` Thomas Huth
2017-07-18  9:37       ` Peter Maydell
2017-07-18  9:42         ` Daniel P. Berrange
2017-07-19  7:46           ` Fam Zheng
2017-07-17 10:02 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2017-07-21  3:24   ` Fam Zheng
2017-07-17 10:39 ` Kevin Wolf
2017-07-17 10:49   ` Peter Maydell
2017-07-17 11:31     ` Kevin Wolf
2017-07-17 13:40       ` Max Reitz
2017-07-28  5:56         ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2017-07-17 23:28   ` Fam Zheng
2017-07-18 10:14     ` Daniel P. Berrange
2017-07-28  5:46 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2017-07-28  6:33   ` Fam Zheng
2017-07-28  7:18     ` Cornelia Huck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170717110614.GK3640@redhat.com \
    --to=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=famz@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.