All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: xen-pciback: remove DRIVER_ATTR() usage
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 16:22:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170719142221.GA30949@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <813c3691-d8d0-28f0-6f49-c2b450a07c42@suse.com>

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 03:17:53PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 19/07/17 14:58, Greg KH wrote:
> > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> > 
> > It's better to be explicit and use the DRIVER_ATTR_RW() and
> > DRIVER_ATTR_RO() macros when defining a driver's sysfs file.
> > 
> > Bonus is this fixes up a checkpatch.pl warning.
> > 
> > This is part of a series to drop DRIVER_ATTR() from the tree entirely.
> > 
> > Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
> > Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> > 
> > ---
> >  drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c |   44 ++++++++++++++++---------------------
> >  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> > 
> > 
> > --- a/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c
> > +++ b/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c
> > @@ -1172,8 +1172,8 @@ out:
> >  	return err;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static ssize_t pcistub_slot_add(struct device_driver *drv, const char *buf,
> > -				size_t count)
> > +static ssize_t new_slot_store(struct device_driver *drv, const char *buf,
> > +			      size_t count)
> >  {
> >  	int domain, bus, slot, func;
> >  	int err;
> > @@ -1189,10 +1189,10 @@ out:
> >  		err = count;
> >  	return err;
> >  }
> > -static DRIVER_ATTR(new_slot, S_IWUSR, NULL, pcistub_slot_add);
> > +static DRIVER_ATTR_WO(new_slot);
> >  
> > -static ssize_t pcistub_slot_remove(struct device_driver *drv, const char *buf,
> > -				   size_t count)
> > +static ssize_t remove_slot_store(struct device_driver *drv, const char *buf,
> > +				 size_t count)
> >  {
> >  	int domain, bus, slot, func;
> >  	int err;
> > @@ -1208,9 +1208,9 @@ out:
> >  		err = count;
> >  	return err;
> >  }
> > -static DRIVER_ATTR(remove_slot, S_IWUSR, NULL, pcistub_slot_remove);
> > +static DRIVER_ATTR_WO(remove_slot);
> >  
> > -static ssize_t pcistub_slot_show(struct device_driver *drv, char *buf)
> > +static ssize_t slots_show(struct device_driver *drv, char *buf)
> >  {
> >  	struct pcistub_device_id *pci_dev_id;
> >  	size_t count = 0;
> > @@ -1231,9 +1231,9 @@ static ssize_t pcistub_slot_show(struct
> >  
> >  	return count;
> >  }
> > -static DRIVER_ATTR(slots, S_IRUSR, pcistub_slot_show, NULL);
> > +static DRIVER_ATTR_RO(slots);
> >  
> > -static ssize_t pcistub_irq_handler_show(struct device_driver *drv, char *buf)
> > +static ssize_t irq_handlers_show(struct device_driver *drv, char *buf)
> >  {
> >  	struct pcistub_device *psdev;
> >  	struct xen_pcibk_dev_data *dev_data;
> > @@ -1260,11 +1260,10 @@ static ssize_t pcistub_irq_handler_show(
> >  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pcistub_devices_lock, flags);
> >  	return count;
> >  }
> > -static DRIVER_ATTR(irq_handlers, S_IRUSR, pcistub_irq_handler_show, NULL);
> > +static DRIVER_ATTR_RO(irq_handlers);
> >  
> > -static ssize_t pcistub_irq_handler_switch(struct device_driver *drv,
> > -					  const char *buf,
> > -					  size_t count)
> > +static ssize_t irq_handler_state_store(struct device_driver *drv,
> > +				       const char *buf, size_t count)
> >  {
> >  	struct pcistub_device *psdev;
> >  	struct xen_pcibk_dev_data *dev_data;
> > @@ -1301,11 +1300,10 @@ out:
> >  		err = count;
> >  	return err;
> >  }
> > -static DRIVER_ATTR(irq_handler_state, S_IWUSR, NULL,
> > -		   pcistub_irq_handler_switch);
> > +static DRIVER_ATTR_WO(irq_handler_state);
> >  
> > -static ssize_t pcistub_quirk_add(struct device_driver *drv, const char *buf,
> > -				 size_t count)
> > +static ssize_t quirks_add(struct device_driver *drv, const char *buf,
> > +			  size_t count)
> 
> Shouldn't this be named quirks_store()?

Odd, yes, it should, I don't know how my build-testing didn't catch
that, sorry.

Let me go make a v2...

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-19 14:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-19 12:58 [PATCH] xen: xen-pciback: remove DRIVER_ATTR() usage Greg KH
2017-07-19 13:17 ` Juergen Gross
2017-07-19 14:22   ` Greg KH [this message]
2017-07-19 14:22   ` Greg KH
2017-07-19 13:17 ` Juergen Gross
2017-07-19 14:43 ` [PATCH v2] " Greg KH
2017-07-19 14:51   ` Juergen Gross
2017-07-19 14:51   ` Juergen Gross
2017-07-19 15:17     ` Greg KH
2017-07-19 17:20       ` Juergen Gross
2017-07-19 17:20       ` Juergen Gross
2017-07-19 15:17     ` Greg KH
2017-07-19 14:43 ` Greg KH
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-07-19 12:58 [PATCH] " Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170719142221.GA30949@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.