[Buildroot] [PATCH v2 1/2] package/qt5: bump latest version to 5.9.1

[Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>]

Hello,

On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 09:18:43 -0700, Joshua Henderson wrote:
> Qt 5.9 is a Long Term Support version [1]. Some license file changes are
> involved, a new dependency on pcre2, and some filename changes.  qt5webkit
> popped back into the picture for 5.9.1 after being absent for 5.9.0
> "officially." QT5_SNAPSHOTS_SITE is removed with this commit as it is not used
> for qtwebkit anymore.
> 
> This removes the following patches that have been upstreamed for 5.9.1:
> 
> - qt5base/5.8.0/0001-fix-parallel-builds-with-qt-freetype-system-libpng.patch [2]
> - qt5base/5.8.0/0002-fix-VNC-platform-plugin-build-on-big-endian-machines.patch [3]
> - qt5base/5.8.0/0003-QAtomic-pass-explicit-failure-mode-to-std-atomic-com.patch [4]
> - qt5base/5.8.0/0003-eglfs-fix-x11-header-related-compile-failure.patch [5]
> - qt5base/5.8.0/0004-examples-fix-compile-without-gui-module.patch [6]
> - qt5webkit/0003-Exclude-backtrace-API-for-non-glibc-libraries.patch [7]
> 
> [1] https://www.qt.io/qt5-9/
> [2] https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtbase.git/commit/?id=4dcfd90e4fd7d4c49138038dbbcbda8794a9fbff
> [3] https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtbase.git/commit/?id=6f64bfa654fb7e20bb75ec3b0544b81482babb44
> [4] https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtbase.git/commit/?id=5cc0de2e084cb887a75b076b82cf470ecdcd4dd3
> [5] https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtbase.git/commit/?id=e9a7739e77f79baeb5452189b6d17e63de5b341d
> [6] https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtbase.git/commit/?id=18d49808db46add078d9d4bcffaac5361d5c7269
> [7] https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtwebkit.git/commit/?id=548380af096f8277e460383c81a4ecdf2b77523f
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joshua Henderson <joshua.henderson@microchip.com>
> Cc: Julien Corjon <corjon.j@ecagroup.com>
> Cc: Brent Sink <brents_3@hotmail.com>
> Cc: Naoki Matsumoto <n-matsumoto@melcoinc.co.jp>

This patch caused a build failure:

  http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/bc1/bc13abf3bb2fe1c991aec2334ee658c9641d1fd5/build-end.log

It seems to be a new build failure, because it never occurred with the
5.8.0 version.

Best regards,

Thomas Petazzoni
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com