From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49E921F600 for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 20:52:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935852AbdGTUwk (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Jul 2017 16:52:40 -0400 Received: from avasout05.plus.net ([84.93.230.250]:47524 "EHLO avasout05.plus.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935802AbdGTUwk (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Jul 2017 16:52:40 -0400 Received: from hashpling.plus.com ([212.159.69.125]) by avasout05 with smtp id n8se1v0022iA9hg018sflF; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 21:52:39 +0100 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=Iav3YSia c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=wpJ/2au8Z6V/NgdivHIBow==:117 a=wpJ/2au8Z6V/NgdivHIBow==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=G3gG6ho9WtcA:10 a=BNFp--SqAAAA:8 a=xhKhFfHbwTHzw-8hJM8A:9 a=57jknnFgR3jVi3Ym:21 a=WKeWc3l4r90PVyjy:21 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=wCHOS_8tIzIYXQCUOVd6:22 Received: from charles by hashpling.plus.com with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dYIR3-0003lR-Vz; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 21:52:38 +0100 Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 21:52:37 +0100 From: Charles Bailey To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Victor Toni , git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King Subject: Re: Handling of paths Message-ID: <20170720205237.GA14368@hashpling.org> References: <20170720200523.GA13792@hashpling.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 01:30:52PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > I've read the function again and I think the attached patch covers > everything that ought to be a filename. > > By the way, to credit you, do you prefer your bloomberg or hashpling > address? The patch looks good to me. It's not critical which address you credit. I mark patches which result from my work at Bloomberg with my Bloomberg email address and anything that I do entirely outside of work with my hashpling address, although I will tend to use my hashpling email for all communications because it co-operates with the mailing list conventions a lot better. In this case, this is a follow on from a cbailey32@bloomberg.net patch so crediting that address seems the more appropriate option. Charles.