From: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
To: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Cc: eric.auger.pro@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
alex.williamson@redhat.com, b.reynal@virtualopensystems.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, marc.zyngier@arm.com,
christoffer.dall@linaro.org, drjones@redhat.com, wei@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: restructure kvm_vgic_(un)map_phys_irq
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 13:44:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170721114439.GE16350@cbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1497531160-29162-5-git-send-email-eric.auger@redhat.com>
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 02:52:36PM +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
> We want to reuse the core of the map/unmap functions for IRQ
> forwarding. Let's move the computation of the hwirq in
> kvm_vgic_map_phys_irq and pass the linux IRQ as parameter.
> the host_irq is added to struct vgic_irq.
>
> We introduce kvm_vgic_map/unmap_irq which take a struct vgic_irq
> handle as a parameter.
So this is to avoid the linux-to-hardware irq number translation in
other callers?
I am sort of guessing that we need to store the host_irq number so that
we can probe into the physical GIC in later patches? That may be good
to note in this commit message if you respin.
Thanks,
-Christoffer
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
> ---
> include/kvm/arm_vgic.h | 8 ++++---
> virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c | 24 +------------------
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> index ef71858..cceb31d 100644
> --- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> +++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> @@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ struct vgic_irq {
> bool hw; /* Tied to HW IRQ */
> struct kref refcount; /* Used for LPIs */
> u32 hwintid; /* HW INTID number */
> + unsigned int host_irq; /* linux irq corresponding to hwintid */
> union {
> u8 targets; /* GICv2 target VCPUs mask */
> u32 mpidr; /* GICv3 target VCPU */
> @@ -301,9 +302,10 @@ int kvm_vgic_inject_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid, unsigned int intid,
> bool level);
> int kvm_vgic_inject_mapped_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid, unsigned int intid,
> bool level);
> -int kvm_vgic_map_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 virt_irq, u32 phys_irq);
> -int kvm_vgic_unmap_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int virt_irq);
> -bool kvm_vgic_map_is_active(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int virt_irq);
> +int kvm_vgic_map_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int host_irq,
> + u32 vintid);
> +int kvm_vgic_unmap_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int vintid);
> +bool kvm_vgic_map_is_active(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int vintid);
>
> int kvm_vgic_vcpu_pending_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
> index 5976609..57a30ab 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
> @@ -617,9 +617,6 @@ int kvm_timer_enable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> struct arch_timer_cpu *timer = &vcpu->arch.timer_cpu;
> struct arch_timer_context *vtimer = vcpu_vtimer(vcpu);
> - struct irq_desc *desc;
> - struct irq_data *data;
> - int phys_irq;
> int ret;
>
> if (timer->enabled)
> @@ -632,26 +629,7 @@ int kvm_timer_enable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> if (!vgic_initialized(vcpu->kvm))
> return -ENODEV;
>
> - /*
> - * Find the physical IRQ number corresponding to the host_vtimer_irq
> - */
> - desc = irq_to_desc(host_vtimer_irq);
> - if (!desc) {
> - kvm_err("%s: no interrupt descriptor\n", __func__);
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> -
> - data = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc);
> - while (data->parent_data)
> - data = data->parent_data;
> -
> - phys_irq = data->hwirq;
> -
> - /*
> - * Tell the VGIC that the virtual interrupt is tied to a
> - * physical interrupt. We do that once per VCPU.
> - */
> - ret = kvm_vgic_map_phys_irq(vcpu, vtimer->irq.irq, phys_irq);
> + ret = kvm_vgic_map_phys_irq(vcpu, host_vtimer_irq, vtimer->irq.irq);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
> index 83b24d2..075f073 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,8 @@
> #include <linux/kvm.h>
> #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
> #include <linux/list_sort.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/irq.h>
>
> #include "vgic.h"
>
> @@ -392,38 +394,66 @@ int kvm_vgic_inject_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid, unsigned int intid,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -int kvm_vgic_map_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 virt_irq, u32 phys_irq)
> +/* @irq->irq_lock must be held */
> +static int kvm_vgic_map_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_irq *irq,
> + unsigned int host_irq)
> {
> - struct vgic_irq *irq = vgic_get_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu, virt_irq);
> + struct irq_desc *desc;
> + struct irq_data *data;
>
> - BUG_ON(!irq);
> -
> - spin_lock(&irq->irq_lock);
> + /*
> + * Find the physical IRQ number corresponding to @host_irq
> + */
> + desc = irq_to_desc(host_irq);
> + if (!desc) {
> + kvm_err("%s: no interrupt descriptor\n", __func__);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + data = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc);
> + while (data->parent_data)
> + data = data->parent_data;
>
> irq->hw = true;
> - irq->hwintid = phys_irq;
> + irq->host_irq = host_irq;
> + irq->hwintid = data->hwirq;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* @irq->irq_lock must be held */
> +static inline void kvm_vgic_unmap_irq(struct vgic_irq *irq)
> +{
> + irq->hw = false;
> + irq->hwintid = 0;
> +}
> +
> +int kvm_vgic_map_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int host_irq,
> + u32 vintid)
> +{
> + struct vgic_irq *irq = vgic_get_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu, vintid);
> + int ret;
>
> + BUG_ON(!irq);
> +
> + spin_lock(&irq->irq_lock);
> + ret = kvm_vgic_map_irq(vcpu, irq, host_irq);
> spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock);
> vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
>
> - return 0;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> -int kvm_vgic_unmap_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int virt_irq)
> +int kvm_vgic_unmap_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int vintid)
> {
> struct vgic_irq *irq;
>
> if (!vgic_initialized(vcpu->kvm))
> return -EAGAIN;
>
> - irq = vgic_get_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu, virt_irq);
> + irq = vgic_get_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu, vintid);
> BUG_ON(!irq);
>
> spin_lock(&irq->irq_lock);
> -
> - irq->hw = false;
> - irq->hwintid = 0;
> -
> + kvm_vgic_unmap_irq(irq);
> spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock);
> vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
>
> @@ -726,9 +756,9 @@ void vgic_kick_vcpus(struct kvm *kvm)
> }
> }
>
> -bool kvm_vgic_map_is_active(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int virt_irq)
> +bool kvm_vgic_map_is_active(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int vintid)
> {
> - struct vgic_irq *irq = vgic_get_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu, virt_irq);
> + struct vgic_irq *irq = vgic_get_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu, vintid);
> bool map_is_active;
>
> spin_lock(&irq->irq_lock);
> --
> 2.5.5
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-21 11:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-15 12:52 [PATCH v2 0/8] ARM/ARM64 Direct EOI setup for VFIO platform interrupts Eric Auger
2017-06-15 12:52 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] VFIO: platform: Differentiate auto-masking from user masking Eric Auger
2017-06-15 12:52 ` Eric Auger
2017-06-15 12:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] VFIO: platform: Introduce direct EOI interrupt handler Eric Auger
2017-06-15 12:52 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] VFIO: platform: Direct EOI irq bypass for ARM/ARM64 Eric Auger
2017-06-15 12:52 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: restructure kvm_vgic_(un)map_phys_irq Eric Auger
2017-06-15 12:52 ` Eric Auger
2017-07-21 11:44 ` Christoffer Dall [this message]
2017-08-22 14:33 ` Auger Eric
2017-06-15 12:52 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Handle mapped level sensitive SPIs Eric Auger
2017-06-15 12:52 ` Eric Auger
2017-07-04 12:15 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-07-07 7:41 ` Auger Eric
2017-07-07 7:41 ` Auger Eric
2017-07-21 13:03 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-25 13:47 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-07-25 14:48 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-25 14:48 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-25 15:41 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-07-26 9:37 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-22 14:35 ` Auger Eric
2017-08-24 14:56 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-23 7:25 ` Auger Eric
2017-07-21 12:11 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-21 12:11 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-22 14:33 ` Auger Eric
2017-08-29 6:45 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-29 6:58 ` Auger Eric
2017-08-29 6:58 ` Auger Eric
2017-06-15 12:52 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Implement forwarding setting Eric Auger
2017-06-15 12:52 ` Eric Auger
2017-07-21 13:13 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-23 8:58 ` Auger Eric
2017-08-29 7:08 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-06-15 12:52 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] virt: irqbypass: Add a type field to the irqbypass producer Eric Auger
2017-06-15 12:52 ` Eric Auger
2017-06-15 12:52 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] KVM: arm/arm64: register DEOI irq bypass consumer on ARM/ARM64 Eric Auger
2017-06-15 12:52 ` Eric Auger
2017-07-21 13:25 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-21 13:25 ` Christoffer Dall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170721114439.GE16350@cbox \
--to=cdall@linaro.org \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=b.reynal@virtualopensystems.com \
--cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.auger.pro@gmail.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=wei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.