All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: John Crispin <john@phrozen.org>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] net-next: add a dma_desc element to struct skb_shared_info
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 22:37:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170721203753.GA26175@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6bcc6463-c2e7-5f56-22b0-f49bb369ce1c@phrozen.org>

John Crispin <john@phrozen.org> wrote:
> When the flow offloading engine forwards a packet to the DMA it will send
> additional info to the sw path. this includes
> * physical switch port
> * internal flow hash - this is required to populate the correct flow table
> entry
> * ppe state - this indicates what state the PPEs internal table is in for
> the flow
> * the reason why the packet was forwarde - these are things like bind,
> unbind, timed out, ...
> 
> once the flow table offloading patches are ready and upstream, the netfilter
> layer will see the SKB and pass it o to the flow table offloading code,

If this is about conntrack offloading, then I prefer if this is done
without changing any core network structure.

What about adding a new conntrack extension to hold whatever info
you need, and then allocate a conntrack entry in the driver?

This would obviously need core changes in conntrack (such as allowing
calls into conntrack from drivers without hard module dependencies,
and a thorough check if this causes backwards problems (e.g.
right now a "-m conntrack" check in the raw table can only succeed for
packets from lo interface).

But I think that could be worked around, esp. if we assume that we
won't see such entries a lot (assuming sw is slowpath and hw handles
most packets).

Thanks,
Florian

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-07-21 20:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-21 15:20 [RFC 0/2] net-next: hw flow offloading John Crispin
2017-07-21 15:20 ` [RFC 1/2] net-next: add a dma_desc element to struct skb_shared_info John Crispin
2017-07-21 15:56   ` Paolo Abeni
2017-07-21 17:01     ` John Crispin
2017-07-21 19:21       ` David Miller
2017-07-21 20:37       ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2017-07-21 15:20 ` [RFC 2/2] net-next: mediatek: populate the shared John Crispin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170721203753.GA26175@breakpoint.cc \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=john@phrozen.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.