From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, quintela@redhat.com,
alex.bennee@linaro.org
Cc: haozhong.zhang@intel.com, peterx@redhat.com, lvivier@redhat.com
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for 2.10] cpu_physical_memory_sync_dirty_bitmap: Fix alignment check
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 16:04:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170724150413.19357-1-dgilbert@redhat.com> (raw)
From: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
This code has an optimised, word aligned version, and a boring
unaligned version. Recently 084140bd498909 fixed a missing offset
addition from the core of both versions. However, the offset isn't
necessarily aligned and thus the choice between the two versions
needs fixing up to also include the offset.
Symptom:
A few stuck unsent pages during migration; not normally noticed
unless under very low bandwidth in which case the migration may get
stuck never ending and never performing a 2nd sync; noticed by
a hanging postcopy-test on a very heavily loaded system.
Fixes: 084140bd498909
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Alex Benneé <alex.benee@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
---
include/exec/ram_addr.h | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/exec/ram_addr.h b/include/exec/ram_addr.h
index c04f4f67f6..c802f7f364 100644
--- a/include/exec/ram_addr.h
+++ b/include/exec/ram_addr.h
@@ -378,15 +378,16 @@ uint64_t cpu_physical_memory_sync_dirty_bitmap(RAMBlock *rb,
{
ram_addr_t addr;
unsigned long page = BIT_WORD(start >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS);
+ unsigned long word = BIT_WORD((start + rb->offset) >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS);
uint64_t num_dirty = 0;
unsigned long *dest = rb->bmap;
/* start address is aligned at the start of a word? */
- if (((page * BITS_PER_LONG) << TARGET_PAGE_BITS) == start) {
+ if (((word * BITS_PER_LONG) << TARGET_PAGE_BITS) ==
+ (start + rb->offset)) {
int k;
int nr = BITS_TO_LONGS(length >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS);
unsigned long * const *src;
- unsigned long word = BIT_WORD((start + rb->offset) >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS);
unsigned long idx = (word * BITS_PER_LONG) / DIRTY_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE;
unsigned long offset = BIT_WORD((word * BITS_PER_LONG) %
DIRTY_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE);
--
2.13.3
next reply other threads:[~2017-07-24 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-24 15:04 Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) [this message]
2017-07-24 15:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for 2.10] cpu_physical_memory_sync_dirty_bitmap: Fix alignment check Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170724150413.19357-1-dgilbert@redhat.com \
--to=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=haozhong.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.