All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Michael Wang <yun.wang@profitbricks.com>, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [ Linux 4.4 stable ] missing 'printk: set may_schedule for some of console_trylock() callers'
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 06:57:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170725135745.GC20317@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8cfee169-00eb-4b08-3440-ccf654a056aa@profitbricks.com>

On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 10:28:16AM +0200, Michael Wang wrote:
> Hi, greg k-h
> 
> During our testing with 4.4.73 we got soft lockup like:
> 
>  NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#2 stuck for 23s! [systemd-udevd:856]
>  ...
>  Call Trace:
>   [<ffffffff8109d139>] vprintk_emit+0x319/0x4a0
>   [<ffffffff8112182d>] printk_emit+0x33/0x3b
>   [<ffffffff812f9e9c>] ? simple_strtoull+0x2c/0x50 
>   [<ffffffff8109d39a>] devkmsg_write+0xaa/0x100
>   [<ffffffff8109d2f0>] ? vprintk+0x30/0x30
>   [<ffffffff811915f2>] do_readv_writev+0x1c2/0x270 
>   [<ffffffff8117899d>] ? kmem_cache_free+0x7d/0x1a0
>   [<ffffffff81191729>] vfs_writev+0x39/0x50
>   [<ffffffff8119240a>] SyS_writev+0x4a/0xd0
>   [<ffffffff8158bc97>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6a
> 
> Currently in 4.4 the console_unlock() called by vprintk_emit() is with
> preemption disabled, so the cond_resched is not working, and soft lockup
> appear if it take too much time on writing data into every console.
> 
> We found the upstream patch:
>   commit 6b97a20d3a79 printk: set may_schedule for some of console_trylock() callers
> 
> which should have addressed this issue, but not included in the latest 4.4.78 stable
> yet, is there any plan on backport it in future?

That commit was in the 4.6 kernel release, so odds are, it's not on a
list of patches to backport any time soon :)

But, you can ask for it to be included, if you cc: the stable@vger list,
like I did here, and add the authors of the patch to the cc: asking if
they have any objection for it being backported (also added here...)

Sergey, any objection for me backporting this?

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-25 13:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-25  8:28 [ Linux 4.4 stable ] missing 'printk: set may_schedule for some of console_trylock() callers' Michael Wang
2017-07-25 13:57 ` Greg KH [this message]
2017-07-25 16:33   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-07-26  8:44     ` Petr Mladek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170725135745.GC20317@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yun.wang@profitbricks.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.