From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40473) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dae84-0005LR-Av for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 04:26:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dae81-0005Gi-0M for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 04:26:44 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:35118) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dae80-0005GL-Qf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 04:26:40 -0400 Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 10:26:36 +0200 From: Cornelia Huck Message-ID: <20170727102636.43d6a789@gondolin> In-Reply-To: <20170725224442.13383-1-pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20170725224442.13383-1-pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] ccw interpretation AR compliance improvements List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Halil Pasic Cc: Christian Borntraeger , Dong Jia Shi , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Wed, 26 Jul 2017 00:44:40 +0200 Halil Pasic wrote: > There were some missing checks. There might be some more missing. For details, > see the individual patches. The checks are not perfect? Colour me shocked ;) > > Regarding testing: did not do much more than a simple smoke test > with virtio-ccw. I think we need a way to throw random channel programs at a channel device... > > Halil Pasic (2): > s390x/css: check ccw address validity > s390x/css: fix bits must be zero check for TIC > > hw/s390x/css.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >