From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42836)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <famz@redhat.com>) id 1dagZo-00016C-02
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 07:03:32 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <famz@redhat.com>) id 1dagZj-0003NS-UH
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 07:03:32 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:36760)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <famz@redhat.com>) id 1dagZj-0003Mm-PA
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 07:03:27 -0400
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 19:03:24 +0800
From: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20170727110324.GG5117@lemon.lan>
References: <20170717063521.GA7393@lemon>
	<20170717090531.GA7163@stefanha-x1.localdomain>
	<CAFEAcA8kt71pbxggfLdP3-WCc8u8v5iijZBksMSq6Yss2ydgiw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20170717093944.GA18516@lemon>
	<CAFEAcA-hzAq=fP6Pndre3b4truxJFV3go0C91d702pMsLGZRrg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20170717102607.GI3640@redhat.com>
	<CAFEAcA8pH6+aTNznDS7hTDTfNniuSBWgORCaiSm=vkAbukpcLw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA8pH6+aTNznDS7hTDTfNniuSBWgORCaiSm=vkAbukpcLw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Status and RFC of patchew testings on QEMU
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>, QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

On Tue, 07/25 10:58, Peter Maydell wrote:
> For patchew, I basically ignore patchew compile failure emails
> because it is too painful to get to the bottom of the email
> where the actual error message is because of the pages and
> pages and pages of useless progress output :-(

Isn't it very easy to go to the bottom with a shortcut key and start looking
from there? That's why I thought including the full log in the email isn't a
problem, while not everyone likes web interface when it comes to working on a
long log (I personally find travis web page annoyingly inefficient).

Fam