From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [nft PATCH RFC v2 3/4] Implement --echo option
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 18:56:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170727165647.GA10869@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170727165435.GS2235@orbyte.nwl.cc>
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 06:54:35PM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 06:43:00PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 06:21:43PM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/netfilter/nf_tables.h b/include/linux/netfilter/nf_tables.h
> > > index 40096de04e963..70404f724808a 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/netfilter/nf_tables.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/netfilter/nf_tables.h
> > > @@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ enum nf_tables_msg_types {
> > > NFT_MSG_GETOBJ,
> > > NFT_MSG_DELOBJ,
> > > NFT_MSG_GETOBJ_RESET,
> > > + NFT_MSG_META_ECHO,
> >
> > Why this?
>
> See netlink_echo_callback(): I want to reuse monitor code as much as
> possible, and therefore introduced that function as common callback
> dispatching to monitor callbacks. In order to make them print data like
> I want them to, I need to have an indicator. The simplest way was to
> introduce this fake type which in callbacks acts as third option to
> NFT_MSG_NEW* or NFT_MSG_DEL*.
Hm, there must be a way to reuse this code without adding a new
message type. From a netlink perspective, users should just set on the
NLM_ECHO flag to get echo reports. I don't want to have a new message
type for this.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-27 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-27 16:21 [nft PATCH RFC v2 0/4] Implement --echo option Phil Sutter
2017-07-27 16:21 ` [nft PATCH RFC v2 1/4] mnl: Consolidate mnl_batch_talk() parameters Phil Sutter
2017-07-27 16:21 ` [nft PATCH RFC v2 2/4] netlink: Pass nlmsg flags from rule.c Phil Sutter
2017-07-27 16:21 ` [nft PATCH RFC v2 3/4] Implement --echo option Phil Sutter
2017-07-27 16:43 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-07-27 16:54 ` Phil Sutter
2017-07-27 16:56 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2017-07-27 17:00 ` Phil Sutter
2017-07-27 16:21 ` [nft PATCH RFC v2 4/4] tests: Add a simple test suite for " Phil Sutter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170727165647.GA10869@salvia \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phil@nwl.cc \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.