From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2017 21:54:01 +0200 From: Solar Designer Message-ID: <20170730195401.GA4243@openwall.com> References: <50c85baff48b33095955d3bbce6004cc@redchan.it> <20170729133844.GA5033@openwall.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170729133844.GA5033@openwall.com> Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] Yes you have standing to sue GRSecurity. To: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com List-ID: On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 03:38:44PM +0200, Solar Designer wrote: > As a moderator, I reluctantly accepted this message on kernel-hardening, > and rejected its copy sent a bit later to oss-security - it's more than > enough to have this on one of these two lists. > > No followups to it, please. Let's focus on actual kernel hardening, not > on the drama. Two things were pointed out to me off-list: 1. nisus@redchan is the same person as aconcernedfossdev, who had made noise in here and on other mailing lists before, and was already banned from here. Here's a posting from nisus@redchan where he or she effectively confirms they were also aconcernedfossdev: http://lists.openwall.net/linux-kernel/2017/07/30/114 2. Me letting the posting through yet not allowing any followups in the same thread makes this one thread one-sided. I have to agree, so if Brad or/and PaX Team want to post any reply, they may. And that will end the thread. Alexander