From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mika Westerberg Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: intel: wrap Intel pin control drivers in an architecture check Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 16:48:57 +0300 Message-ID: <20170731134857.GU2369@lahna.fi.intel.com> References: <20170704064947.10792-1-pbrobinson@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:40589 "EHLO mga04.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750987AbdGaNtd (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Jul 2017 09:49:33 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: Peter Robinson , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , Heikki Krogerus On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 03:41:16PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > The Intel pin control drivers are architecture specific so add an if arch > > to check for X86 or compile test to ensure continued test coverage. > > > > Cc: Mika Westerberg > > Cc: Heikki Krogerus > > Signed-off-by: Peter Robinson > > I'm waiting for Mika to say what he thinks about this. He's the overall > Intel pin control maintainer. Looks fine to me, Acked-by: Mika Westerberg