From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
To: "Baicar, Tyler" <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org, will.deacon@arm.com,
james.morse@arm.com, shiju.jose@huawei.com,
geliangtang@gmail.com, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: apei: clear error status before acknowledging the error
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 10:00:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170731170017.2vwxhewivgpyvpea@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fd826be1-50b0-1f82-3fb3-a32a356c45c4@codeaurora.org>
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 10:15:27AM -0600, Baicar, Tyler wrote:
> I think the better thing to do in this case is still send the ack. If
> ghes_read_estatus() fails, then
> either we are unable to read the estatus or the estatus is empty/invalid.
Right now we silently handle that failure of ghes_read_estatus(). That
might be hiding some Linux bugs if we are calling ghes_proc() in cases
where we shouldn't.
Perhaps we should have something like this, so if systems do start acting
weirdly there will be a note that we took this path:
rc = ghes_read_estatus(ghes, 0);
if (rc) {
pr_notice("surprise failure reading ghes estatus\n");
goto out;
}
> If we do not send the ack, then we will be in a scenario where FW will not
> send any more errors.
We might ACK something that the firmware didn't send, which may
lead to other problems.
> I think it would be better to still have the FW send the errors and kernel
> complain about issues with
But I agree with this. We should send the ACK. Luckliy this doesn't have
a long legacy problem because the whole ACK mechanism is a new thing. So
we only have to worry about GHESv2 supporting BIOS.
-Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-31 17:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-28 22:25 [PATCH] acpi: apei: clear error status before acknowledging the error Tyler Baicar
2017-07-29 6:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-31 16:15 ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-07-31 17:00 ` Luck, Tony [this message]
2017-07-31 17:44 ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-08-03 22:06 ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-07-31 17:11 ` James Morse
2017-07-31 17:57 ` Baicar, Tyler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170731170017.2vwxhewivgpyvpea@intel.com \
--to=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=geliangtang@gmail.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=shiju.jose@huawei.com \
--cc=tbaicar@codeaurora.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.