From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33351) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dcFrA-0007YS-Ck for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 14:55:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dcFr5-0003Nw-EQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 14:55:56 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:44340) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dcFr5-0003Mh-4x for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 14:55:51 -0400 Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 21:55:46 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20170731215200-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <1500761743-1669-1-git-send-email-zuban32s@gmail.com> <1500761743-1669-5-git-send-email-zuban32s@gmail.com> <20170726215625-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20170727022103-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <98048fb7-34e7-d92f-cbe5-90f39c9fcb46@redhat.com> <20170729021229-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <1761dcb9-420b-228f-f3d1-149b66e5ec4c@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1761dcb9-420b-228f-f3d1-149b66e5ec4c@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [SeaBIOS] [RFC PATCH v2 4/6] hw/pci: introduce bridge-only vendor-specific capability to provide some hints to firmware List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Laszlo Ersek Cc: Marcel Apfelbaum , Alexander Bezzubikov , seabios@seabios.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Gerd Hoffmann , pbonzini@redhat.com, rth@twiddle.net On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 08:16:49PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > OK. If the proposed solution with the r/o mem base/limit registers is > rooted in the spec (and I think it indeed must be; apparently this would > be the same as what we're already planning for IO disablement), then > that's a strong argument for PciBusDxe to accommodate this probing in > the platform hook. > > Thanks > Laszlo Do you mean making base/limit read-only?