From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: "Johan Hovold" <johan@kernel.org>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>,
"Marek Szyprowski" <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
"Sricharan R" <sricharan@codeaurora.org>,
"Stefan Wahren" <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-mapping: skip USB devices when configuring DMA during probe
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2017 14:37:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170803123729.GT30136@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f203fd95-886b-adf6-33f9-e85a9198711f@arm.com>
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 12:50:20PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Hi Johan,
>
> On 03/08/17 11:05, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > USB devices use the DMA mask and offset of the controller, which have
> > already been setup when a device is probed. Note that modifying the mask
> > of a USB device would change the mask for the controller (and all
> > devices on the bus) as the mask is literally shared.
>
> If I understand the situation correctly, some USB devices have to
> pretend to be DMA masters in order to interact properly with subsystems
> that make DMA mapping calls directly, because those subsystems don't
> have access to the 'real' DMA master sysdev (and shouldn't have to know
> anyway). If that is the case, then there's really a much more general
> problem, because correct DMA API operation can depend on other things
> like IOMMU stuff and archdata which cannot be arbitrarily copied or
> shared between devices.
Right, take a look at usb_alloc_dev() and commit b44bbc46a8bb ("usb:
core: setup dma_pfn_offset for USB devices and, interfaces") for some
background. Note that we've been setting dma_mask this way since before
git.
> What with things like the DWC3 glue layer device mess as well, the
> feeling I'm getting is that this probably needs addressing at the driver
> core/DMA API level - if we had some flag in struct device to say "I can
> effectively do DMA, but proxied through my parent", the DMA API could
> pick that up and internally chase down the correct DMA master device,
> and we could then probably clean up a lot of the "sysdev"-type gunk in
> various driver layers as well.
>
> For expedience of keeping the existing hack working, though, I think
> this patch is OK.
Yes, we should fix the immediate regression first.
> > Since commit 2bf698671205 ("USB: of: fix root-hub device-tree node
> > handling"), of_dma_configure() would be called also for root hubs, which
> > use the device node of the controller. A separate bug that makes
> > of_dma_configure() generate a 30-bit DMA mask from the RPI3's
> > "dma-ranges" would thus set a broken mask also for the controller. This
> > in turn leads to USB devices failing to enumerate when control transfers
> > fail:
>
> If we're calling out that (long-standing) bug in particular, it might be
> worth clarifying that it's benign for the HCD itself because the dwc2
> driver still sets a 32-bit mask afterwards on probe - the breakage is
> specifically from the subsequent of_dma_configure() call with the root
> hub resetting the HCD's mask again *after* the HCD driver has configured
> it (and started to perform DMA), which is just fundamentally wrong
> regardless of what it ends up set to.
Good point, I'll amend this paragraph.
> > dwc2 3f980000.usb: Cannot do DMA to address 0x000000003a166a00
> >
> > Fix this, and similar future problems, by simply skipping USB devices
> > when dma_configure() is called during probe.
> >
> > Fixes: 09515ef5ddad ("of/acpi: Configure dma operations at probe time for platform/amba/pci bus devices")
> > Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.12
> > Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> > Cc: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
> > Cc: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>
> > Reported-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
> > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/base/dma-mapping.c | 8 ++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/dma-mapping.c b/drivers/base/dma-mapping.c
> > index b555ff9dd8fc..c6cde7e79599 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/dma-mapping.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/dma-mapping.c
> > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> > #include <linux/gfp.h>
> > #include <linux/of_device.h>
> > #include <linux/slab.h>
> > +#include <linux/usb.h>
> > #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -345,6 +346,10 @@ int dma_configure(struct device *dev)
> > enum dev_dma_attr attr;
> > int ret = 0;
> >
> > + /* USB devices share the controller's mask. */
> > + if (dev->bus == &usb_bus_type)
>
> Maybe a dev_is_usb() helper to mimic dev_is_pci()?
Yeah, I considered that but figured it wasn't essential for a minimal
patch marked for stable, but then again, such a macro would be
straight-forward enough. I'll respin.
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > if (dev_is_pci(dev)) {
> > bridge = pci_get_host_bridge_device(to_pci_dev(dev));
> > dma_dev = bridge;
> > @@ -369,6 +374,9 @@ int dma_configure(struct device *dev)
> >
> > void dma_deconfigure(struct device *dev)
> > {
> > + if (dev->bus == &usb_bus_type)
> > + return;
> > +
> > of_dma_deconfigure(dev);
> > acpi_dma_deconfigure(dev);
> > }
Thanks,
Johan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-03 12:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-03 10:05 [PATCH] dma-mapping: skip USB devices when configuring DMA during probe Johan Hovold
2017-08-03 11:50 ` Robin Murphy
2017-08-03 12:37 ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2017-08-03 19:40 ` kbuild test robot
2017-08-04 7:43 ` Johan Hovold
2017-08-03 19:41 ` kbuild test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170803123729.GT30136@localhost \
--to=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=sricharan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefan.wahren@i2se.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.