From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: "Johan Hovold" <johan@kernel.org>,
"Alan Stern" <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>,
"Marek Szyprowski" <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
"Sricharan R" <sricharan@codeaurora.org>,
"Stefan Wahren" <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dma-mapping: skip USB devices when configuring DMA during probe
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2017 16:53:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170803145337.GW30136@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ccee85b5-832f-b2b8-e4ac-69165efff184@arm.com>
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 03:48:06PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 03/08/17 15:23, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 10:04:21AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> >> On Thu, 3 Aug 2017, Johan Hovold wrote:
> >>> diff --git a/include/linux/usb.h b/include/linux/usb.h
> >>> index cb9fbd54386e..f86ad9d8c756 100644
> >>> --- a/include/linux/usb.h
> >>> +++ b/include/linux/usb.h
> >>> @@ -1222,6 +1222,11 @@ struct usb_device_driver {
> >>>
> >>> extern struct bus_type usb_bus_type;
> >>>
> >>> +static inline bool dev_is_usb(struct device *dev)
> >>> +{
> >>> + return dev->bus == &usb_bus_type;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>
> >> Will this work if the USB subsystem is built as a module?
> >
> > Nope. :-/
>
> Oh bum, I hadn't even realised usb_bus_type could be modular.
>
> > Add another flag (e.g. skip_dma_configure) to struct device for now?
>
> Would it be sufficient to look for dev->of_node_reused, or is it also
> possible for USB devices to have OF nodes of their own such that
> of_dma_configure() would still blat the mask with a 32-bit default?
> (Although that would still un-break Rpi3, even if strictly wrong)
Yes, USB devices can have their own OF nodes so of_node_reused would not
prevent of_dma_configure() from being called for them.
But testing against the platform bus instead of not-USB should do the
trick.
Johan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-03 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-03 13:14 [PATCH v2] dma-mapping: skip USB devices when configuring DMA during probe Johan Hovold
2017-08-03 13:20 ` Robin Murphy
2017-08-03 14:04 ` Alan Stern
2017-08-03 14:23 ` Johan Hovold
2017-08-03 14:48 ` Robin Murphy
2017-08-03 14:53 ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2017-08-03 14:49 ` Johan Hovold
2017-08-03 15:57 ` Johan Hovold
2017-08-06 11:27 ` kbuild test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170803145337.GW30136@localhost \
--to=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=sricharan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefan.wahren@i2se.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.