All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Massimo Sala <massimo.sala.71@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: sysctl, argument parsing, possible bug
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 12:04:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170808120440.713f1a38@xeon-e3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv20-XwH=Ltqt6Xw++q2LbcHKmJhn76ZukF-Tr6a4Yd6rbJAg@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 8 Aug 2017 20:26:36 +0200
Massimo Sala <massimo.sala.71@gmail.com> wrote:

> I make another test with kernel 4.9.32-15.41
> 
> sysctl procps version 3.2.8
> 
>     sysctl net.ipv4.conf.eth0.100.forwarding
>     error: "net.ipv4.conf.eth0.100.forwarding" is an unknown key
> 
> 
> so I install busybox :
> 
> BusyBox v1.19.3
> 
>     busybox sysctl net.ipv4.conf.eth0.100.forwarding
>     net.ipv4.conf.eth0.100.forwarding = 0
> 
> It is working, as I expect reading busybox source sysctl.c
> 
> 
> 
> Stephen, I test
>     sysctl net/ipv4/conf/eth0.100/forwarding
> I confirm it  works.
> 
> 
> What is the problem ?
> 
> As sysctl, also automation tools and scripts cannot be "netdev names
> aware", and so they fail using the usual dot notation.
> 
> 
> I don't pretend to change sysctl to read from the /proc/sys/
> directory, as busybox does.
> 
> I suggest to add a  remark to the man page of sysctl, reporting the
> difference between the two tools and an example of the alternate
> syntax :
>     sysctl net/ipv4/conf/eth0.100/forwarding
> 
> 
> Thank you for your attention.
> Best regards, Massimo

Busybox has always been a restricted subset of the upstream standard tools.
If you have problems with busybox take it up with those developers directly;
this is not the right mailing list for that.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-08 19:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-08 18:26 sysctl, argument parsing, possible bug Massimo Sala
2017-08-08 19:04 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-08-01 20:47 Massimo Sala
2017-08-01 21:27 ` Cong Wang
2017-08-01 21:34   ` Massimo Sala
2017-08-01 21:54     ` Cong Wang
2017-08-02 21:53       ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-08-02  2:40   ` Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170808120440.713f1a38@xeon-e3 \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=massimo.sala.71@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.