From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from ec2-52-27-115-49.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com ([52.27.115.49]:51764 "EHLO osg.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752406AbdHIP7i (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Aug 2017 11:59:38 -0400 Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 12:59:30 -0300 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: Sakari Ailus Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [GIT PULL for 4.14] Stream control documentation Message-ID: <20170809125930.7e97bd47@vento.lan> In-Reply-To: <20170809153507.q5wneyi4x3m7etfa@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk> References: <20170809080340.4c5b4jjypqiqyllp@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk> <20170809122917.0461db2c@vento.lan> <20170809153507.q5wneyi4x3m7etfa@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Em Wed, 9 Aug 2017 18:35:07 +0300 Sakari Ailus escreveu: > Hi Mauro, > > On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 12:29:17PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > Em Wed, 9 Aug 2017 11:03:40 +0300 > > Sakari Ailus escreveu: > > > > > Hi Mauro, > > > > > > Add stream control documentation. > > > > > > We have recently added support for hardware that makes it possible to have > > > pipelines that are controlled by more than two drivers. This necessitates > > > documenting V4L2 stream control behaviour for such pipelines. > > > > Perhaps I missed this one, but I'm not seeing any e-mail with > > "docs-rst: media: Document s_stream() video op usage" > > > > Please always submit patches via e-mail too, as it makes easier for > > us to comment/review when needed. > > > > In any case, I'm appending the patch contents here. I'll reply to it > > on a next e-mail. > > The subject of the patch was changed based on the review comments. The > patch used to be called "docs-rst: media: Document s_stream() core op > usage". On such cases, please send a version 2. The primary key to look for a patch is the patch name :-) > > The changes were rather trivial (core -> video) so I didn't send an update > to the original one. > > The patch is available here: > > As I posted it at the reply, I replied with my comments to the one I posted, with matches the version on your pull request. Thanks, Mauro