From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Cihangir Akturk <cakturk@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 24/28] drm/vc4: switch to drm_*_get(), drm_*_put()
 helpers
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 23:06:31 +0300
Message-ID: <20170814200631.GA1270@mbp>
References: <1502454794-28558-1-git-send-email-cakturk@gmail.com>
 <1502454794-28558-25-git-send-email-cakturk@gmail.com>
 <874ltagcei.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <874ltagcei.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Cc: daniel@ffwll.ch, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org

On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 12:47:01PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Cihangir Akturk <cakturk@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > Use drm_*_get() and drm_*_put() helpers instead of drm_*_reference()
> > and drm_*_unreference() helpers.
> >
> > drm_*_reference() and drm_*_unreference() functions are just
> > compatibility alias for drm_*_get() and drm_*_put() and should not be
> > used by new code. So convert all users of compatibility functions to
> > use the new APIs.
> 
> Mind if I change the subject line to "drm/vc4: Continue the switch to
> drm_*_put() helpers"? to distinguish from the patch that already landed?

It's OK with me. Go ahead, change to whatever you want.

> 
> (Looks like your previous patch was generated before my BO labeling code
> landed, so we got another little patch here cleaning up the new code as
> well)

Thanks, Cihangir.