diff for duplicates of <20170815154743.GK7017@linux.vnet.ibm.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 0cd60f7..cba92b9 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -42,15 +42,15 @@ On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 05:25:55PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So I look for "rcu_preempt" timer events and find these: > > > > > > > > -> > > > > > > > rcu_preempt-9 [019] .... 827.579114: timer_init: timer=ffff8017d5fc7da0 -> > > > > > > > rcu_preempt-9 [019] d..1 827.579115: timer_start: timer=ffff8017d5fc7da0 function=process_timeout +> > > > > > > > rcu_preempt-9 [019] .... 827.579114: timer_init: timerÿff8017d5fc7da0 +> > > > > > > > rcu_preempt-9 [019] d..1 827.579115: timer_start: timerÿff8017d5fc7da0 function=process_timeout > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Next look for "ffff8017d5fc7da0" and I don't find anything else. > > > > > > > It does show up off the bottom of what would fit in pastebin... > > > > > > > -> > > > > > > rcu_preempt-9 [001] d..1 837.681077: timer_cancel: timer=ffff8017d5fc7da0 -> > > > > > > rcu_preempt-9 [001] .... 837.681086: timer_init: timer=ffff8017d5fc7da0 -> > > > > > > rcu_preempt-9 [001] d..1 837.681087: timer_start: timer=ffff8017d5fc7da0 function=process_timeout expires=4295101298 [timeout=1] cpu=1 idx=0 flags= +> > > > > > > rcu_preempt-9 [001] d..1 837.681077: timer_cancel: timerÿff8017d5fc7da0 +> > > > > > > rcu_preempt-9 [001] .... 837.681086: timer_init: timerÿff8017d5fc7da0 +> > > > > > > rcu_preempt-9 [001] d..1 837.681087: timer_start: timerÿff8017d5fc7da0 function=process_timeout expiresB95101298 [timeout=1] cpu=1 idx=0 flags= > > > > > > > > > > > > Odd. I would expect an expiration... And ten seconds is way longer > > > > > > than the requested one jiffy! @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 05:25:55PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > > > > > > There is an errata work around for the timers on this particular board. > > > > > > > I'm only vaguely aware of it, so may be unconnected. > > > > > > > -> > > > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c?h=v4.13-rc2&id=bb42ca47401010fc02901b5e8f79e40a26f208cb +> > > > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c?h=v4.13-rc2&id»42ca47401010fc02901b5e8f79e40a26f208cb > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Seems unlikely though! + we've not yet seen it on the other chips that > > > > > > > errata effects (not that that means much). diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 62ebf62..dcff877 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -10,19 +10,8 @@ "ref\020170802172555.0000468a@huawei.com\0" "From\0Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>\0" "Subject\0Re: RCU lockup issues when CONFIG_SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR=n - any one else seeing this?\0" - "Date\0Tue, 15 Aug 2017 08:47:43 -0700\0" - "To\0Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>\0" - "Cc\0dzickus@redhat.com" - sfr@canb.auug.org.au - linuxarm@huawei.com - Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> - abdhalee@linux.vnet.ibm.com - sparclinux@vger.kernel.org - akpm@linux-foundation.org - linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org - David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org - " tglx@linutronix.de\0" + "Date\0Tue, 15 Aug 2017 15:47:43 +0000\0" + "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 05:25:55PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:\n" @@ -69,15 +58,15 @@ "> > > > > > > > \n" "> > > > > > > > So I look for \"rcu_preempt\" timer events and find these:\n" "> > > > > > > > \n" - "> > > > > > > > rcu_preempt-9 [019] .... 827.579114: timer_init: timer=ffff8017d5fc7da0\n" - "> > > > > > > > rcu_preempt-9 [019] d..1 827.579115: timer_start: timer=ffff8017d5fc7da0 function=process_timeout \n" + "> > > > > > > > rcu_preempt-9 [019] .... 827.579114: timer_init: timer\303\277ff8017d5fc7da0\n" + "> > > > > > > > rcu_preempt-9 [019] d..1 827.579115: timer_start: timer\303\277ff8017d5fc7da0 function=process_timeout \n" "> > > > > > > > \n" "> > > > > > > > Next look for \"ffff8017d5fc7da0\" and I don't find anything else. \n" "> > > > > > > It does show up off the bottom of what would fit in pastebin...\n" "> > > > > > > \n" - "> > > > > > > rcu_preempt-9 [001] d..1 837.681077: timer_cancel: timer=ffff8017d5fc7da0\n" - "> > > > > > > rcu_preempt-9 [001] .... 837.681086: timer_init: timer=ffff8017d5fc7da0\n" - "> > > > > > > rcu_preempt-9 [001] d..1 837.681087: timer_start: timer=ffff8017d5fc7da0 function=process_timeout expires=4295101298 [timeout=1] cpu=1 idx=0 flags= \n" + "> > > > > > > rcu_preempt-9 [001] d..1 837.681077: timer_cancel: timer\303\277ff8017d5fc7da0\n" + "> > > > > > > rcu_preempt-9 [001] .... 837.681086: timer_init: timer\303\277ff8017d5fc7da0\n" + "> > > > > > > rcu_preempt-9 [001] d..1 837.681087: timer_start: timer\303\277ff8017d5fc7da0 function=process_timeout expiresB95101298 [timeout=1] cpu=1 idx=0 flags= \n" "> > > > > > \n" "> > > > > > Odd. I would expect an expiration... And ten seconds is way longer\n" "> > > > > > than the requested one jiffy!\n" @@ -97,7 +86,7 @@ "> > > > > > > There is an errata work around for the timers on this particular board.\n" "> > > > > > > I'm only vaguely aware of it, so may be unconnected.\n" "> > > > > > > \n" - "> > > > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c?h=v4.13-rc2&id=bb42ca47401010fc02901b5e8f79e40a26f208cb\n" + "> > > > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c?h=v4.13-rc2&id\302\27342ca47401010fc02901b5e8f79e40a26f208cb\n" "> > > > > > > \n" "> > > > > > > Seems unlikely though! + we've not yet seen it on the other chips that\n" "> > > > > > > errata effects (not that that means much). \n" @@ -174,4 +163,4 @@ " \treturn tick;\n" } -d5c8820e5a5e60d9bcbdde526f09297d162b72b51b5aad48564ac33b94633a45 +09999097ae1ad01a6fd93ab108357776e86bc16ca564d842729e35884382fb30
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index 62ebf62..ed5a0a6 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -8,21 +8,10 @@ "ref\020170731162757.000058ba@huawei.com\0" "ref\020170801184646.GE3730@linux.vnet.ibm.com\0" "ref\020170802172555.0000468a@huawei.com\0" - "From\0Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>\0" - "Subject\0Re: RCU lockup issues when CONFIG_SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR=n - any one else seeing this?\0" + "From\0paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com (Paul E. McKenney)\0" + "Subject\0RCU lockup issues when CONFIG_SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR=n - any one else seeing this?\0" "Date\0Tue, 15 Aug 2017 08:47:43 -0700\0" - "To\0Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>\0" - "Cc\0dzickus@redhat.com" - sfr@canb.auug.org.au - linuxarm@huawei.com - Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> - abdhalee@linux.vnet.ibm.com - sparclinux@vger.kernel.org - akpm@linux-foundation.org - linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org - David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org - " tglx@linutronix.de\0" + "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 05:25:55PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:\n" @@ -174,4 +163,4 @@ " \treturn tick;\n" } -d5c8820e5a5e60d9bcbdde526f09297d162b72b51b5aad48564ac33b94633a45 +2f186dd6b37440ef924b964000fd533055318642ec98b9704d51c7bc55ee1564
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.