All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <20170817100721.3d92f236.cohuck@redhat.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index eff3a21..ef198d5 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ be done by common code.
 >  	}
 > +	rcu_read_unlock();
 >  
->  	if (started_vcpus = 0) {
+>  	if (started_vcpus == 0) {
 >  		/* we're the only active VCPU -> speed it up */
 > @@ -3455,6 +3461,7 @@ void kvm_s390_vcpu_stop(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 >  {
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ These two only care for two cases: 0 started cpus <-> 1 started cpu and
 that in the arch code instead of walking the array.
 
 >  
->  	if (started_vcpus = 1) {
+>  	if (started_vcpus == 1) {
 >  		/*
 (...)
 > @@ -2518,20 +2552,24 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_create_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, u32 id)
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 2674f92..ecf9991 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
  "ref\020170816194037.9460-3-rkrcmar@redhat.com\0"
  "From\0Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>\0"
  "Subject\0Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] KVM: RCU protected dynamic vcpus array\0"
- "Date\0Thu, 17 Aug 2017 08:07:21 +0000\0"
+ "Date\0Thu, 17 Aug 2017 10:07:21 +0200\0"
  "To\0Radim Kr\304\215m\303\241\305\231 <rkrcmar@redhat.com>\0"
  "Cc\0linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org"
   kvm@vger.kernel.org
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@
  ">  \t}\n"
  "> +\trcu_read_unlock();\n"
  ">  \n"
- ">  \tif (started_vcpus = 0) {\n"
+ ">  \tif (started_vcpus == 0) {\n"
  ">  \t\t/* we're the only active VCPU -> speed it up */\n"
  "> @@ -3455,6 +3461,7 @@ void kvm_s390_vcpu_stop(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)\n"
  ">  {\n"
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@
  "that in the arch code instead of walking the array.\n"
  "\n"
  ">  \n"
- ">  \tif (started_vcpus = 1) {\n"
+ ">  \tif (started_vcpus == 1) {\n"
  ">  \t\t/*\n"
  "(...)\n"
  "> @@ -2518,20 +2552,24 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_create_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, u32 id)\n"
@@ -171,4 +171,4 @@
  ">  \tdebugfs_remove_recursive(vcpu->debugfs_dentry);\n"
  >  vcpu_destroy:
 
-9ab3aa187c6eba841c698c0dbce9e58fa1eec81534121407ea7b6f9133f045bf
+1e6d5db4f7d43c72a32a22efb40de05868a794db479e3898c7acce1f889d0305

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt
index eff3a21..520f802 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N2/1.txt
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ be done by common code.
 >  	}
 > +	rcu_read_unlock();
 >  
->  	if (started_vcpus = 0) {
+>  	if (started_vcpus == 0) {
 >  		/* we're the only active VCPU -> speed it up */
 > @@ -3455,6 +3461,7 @@ void kvm_s390_vcpu_stop(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 >  {
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ These two only care for two cases: 0 started cpus <-> 1 started cpu and
 that in the arch code instead of walking the array.
 
 >  
->  	if (started_vcpus = 1) {
+>  	if (started_vcpus == 1) {
 >  		/*
 (...)
 > @@ -2518,20 +2552,24 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_create_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, u32 id)
@@ -148,3 +148,9 @@ Much of the arch code seems to care about one of two things:
 >  	mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
 >  	debugfs_remove_recursive(vcpu->debugfs_dentry);
 >  vcpu_destroy:
+
+
+_______________________________________________
+linux-arm-kernel mailing list
+linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
+http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest
index 2674f92..4a822ba 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N2/content_digest
@@ -2,22 +2,22 @@
  "ref\020170816194037.9460-3-rkrcmar@redhat.com\0"
  "From\0Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>\0"
  "Subject\0Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] KVM: RCU protected dynamic vcpus array\0"
- "Date\0Thu, 17 Aug 2017 08:07:21 +0000\0"
+ "Date\0Thu, 17 Aug 2017 10:07:21 +0200\0"
  "To\0Radim Kr\304\215m\303\241\305\231 <rkrcmar@redhat.com>\0"
- "Cc\0linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org"
+ "Cc\0linux-mips@linux-mips.org"
+  James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
   kvm@vger.kernel.org
-  linux-mips@linux-mips.org
-  kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org
   linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
-  linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
-  Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
+  Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
   David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
+  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
+  kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org
   Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
-  Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
   Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-  James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
+  Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.com>
   Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
- " Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.com>\0"
+  Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
+ " linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 21:40:37 +0200\n"
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@
  ">  \t}\n"
  "> +\trcu_read_unlock();\n"
  ">  \n"
- ">  \tif (started_vcpus = 0) {\n"
+ ">  \tif (started_vcpus == 0) {\n"
  ">  \t\t/* we're the only active VCPU -> speed it up */\n"
  "> @@ -3455,6 +3461,7 @@ void kvm_s390_vcpu_stop(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)\n"
  ">  {\n"
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@
  "that in the arch code instead of walking the array.\n"
  "\n"
  ">  \n"
- ">  \tif (started_vcpus = 1) {\n"
+ ">  \tif (started_vcpus == 1) {\n"
  ">  \t\t/*\n"
  "(...)\n"
  "> @@ -2518,20 +2552,24 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_create_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, u32 id)\n"
@@ -169,6 +169,12 @@
  "> +\tkvfree(new);\n"
  ">  \tmutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);\n"
  ">  \tdebugfs_remove_recursive(vcpu->debugfs_dentry);\n"
- >  vcpu_destroy:
+ ">  vcpu_destroy:\n"
+ "\n"
+ "\n"
+ "_______________________________________________\n"
+ "linux-arm-kernel mailing list\n"
+ "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\n"
+ http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
 
-9ab3aa187c6eba841c698c0dbce9e58fa1eec81534121407ea7b6f9133f045bf
+86e7e453fdf668ced346644f712b9522f369421e74248b70ed172ee9225b9eac

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N3/1.txt
index eff3a21..cc413b4 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N3/1.txt
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 21:40:37 +0200
-Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> wrote:
+Radim Kr?m?? <rkrcmar@redhat.com> wrote:
 
 > This is a prototype with many TODO comments to give a better idea of
 > what would be needed.
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ be done by common code.
 >  	}
 > +	rcu_read_unlock();
 >  
->  	if (started_vcpus = 0) {
+>  	if (started_vcpus == 0) {
 >  		/* we're the only active VCPU -> speed it up */
 > @@ -3455,6 +3461,7 @@ void kvm_s390_vcpu_stop(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 >  {
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ These two only care for two cases: 0 started cpus <-> 1 started cpu and
 that in the arch code instead of walking the array.
 
 >  
->  	if (started_vcpus = 1) {
+>  	if (started_vcpus == 1) {
 >  		/*
 (...)
 > @@ -2518,20 +2552,24 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_create_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, u32 id)
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N3/content_digest
index 2674f92..7bfbc67 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N3/content_digest
@@ -1,27 +1,13 @@
  "ref\020170816194037.9460-1-rkrcmar@redhat.com\0"
  "ref\020170816194037.9460-3-rkrcmar@redhat.com\0"
- "From\0Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>\0"
- "Subject\0Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] KVM: RCU protected dynamic vcpus array\0"
- "Date\0Thu, 17 Aug 2017 08:07:21 +0000\0"
- "To\0Radim Kr\304\215m\303\241\305\231 <rkrcmar@redhat.com>\0"
- "Cc\0linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org"
-  kvm@vger.kernel.org
-  linux-mips@linux-mips.org
-  kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org
-  linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
-  linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
-  Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-  David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
-  Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
-  Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-  Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-  James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
-  Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
- " Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.com>\0"
+ "From\0cohuck@redhat.com (Cornelia Huck)\0"
+ "Subject\0[PATCH RFC 2/2] KVM: RCU protected dynamic vcpus array\0"
+ "Date\0Thu, 17 Aug 2017 10:07:21 +0200\0"
+ "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 21:40:37 +0200\n"
- "Radim Kr\304\215m\303\241\305\231 <rkrcmar@redhat.com> wrote:\n"
+ "Radim Kr?m?? <rkrcmar@redhat.com> wrote:\n"
  "\n"
  "> This is a prototype with many TODO comments to give a better idea of\n"
  "> what would be needed.\n"
@@ -97,7 +83,7 @@
  ">  \t}\n"
  "> +\trcu_read_unlock();\n"
  ">  \n"
- ">  \tif (started_vcpus = 0) {\n"
+ ">  \tif (started_vcpus == 0) {\n"
  ">  \t\t/* we're the only active VCPU -> speed it up */\n"
  "> @@ -3455,6 +3461,7 @@ void kvm_s390_vcpu_stop(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)\n"
  ">  {\n"
@@ -129,7 +115,7 @@
  "that in the arch code instead of walking the array.\n"
  "\n"
  ">  \n"
- ">  \tif (started_vcpus = 1) {\n"
+ ">  \tif (started_vcpus == 1) {\n"
  ">  \t\t/*\n"
  "(...)\n"
  "> @@ -2518,20 +2552,24 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_create_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, u32 id)\n"
@@ -171,4 +157,4 @@
  ">  \tdebugfs_remove_recursive(vcpu->debugfs_dentry);\n"
  >  vcpu_destroy:
 
-9ab3aa187c6eba841c698c0dbce9e58fa1eec81534121407ea7b6f9133f045bf
+2f0a90a7044bae469476abc8b92d6b56468361fce34084bc55aea878ef3850fc

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.