From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 13:38:22 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Lars-Peter Clausen CC: Jonathan Cameron , , Hartmut Knaack , "Peter Meerwald-Stadler" Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 00/45] IIO: Drop manual assignment of THIS_MODULE Message-ID: <20170821133822.0000053f@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20170723162627.22534-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> <20170820161301.1d4570db@archlinux> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" List-ID: On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 09:42:01 +0200 Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > On 08/20/2017 05:13 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > If anyone has time to look over this set that would be great. > > > > The ancient problem for maintainers, who is the reviewer of last > > resort? Oh me... That doesn't work for my patches :) > > > > No actual rush though - don't mind if these sit until next cycle - > > would just get irritating if they sit until the one after and I have > > to rebase them again... > > Sorry, for the delay. Whole series > > Reviewed-by: Lars-Peter Clausen > > (I didn't actually review each of the individual '-.driver_module = > THIS_MODULE', but I assume coccinelle did the right thing based on the > spatch script). I did a couple of the new ones by hand but they look the same so should be fine! Thanks for review. I'll drop the coccinelle patch I think as the field will have gone away so it won't be possible to set it wrong in future. Jonathan > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html