All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] blk-mq: don't use WORK_CPU_UNBOUND
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 07:48:56 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170821144855.GF491396@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170821134951.18848-2-lvivier@redhat.com>

On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 03:49:51PM +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> cpumask is the list of CPUs present when the queue is built.
> If a new CPU is hotplugged, this list is not updated,
> and when the scheduler asks for a CPU id, blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu()
> can return WORK_CPU_UNBOUND.
> And in this case _blk_mq_run_hw_queue() can be executed by the new CPU
> (that is not present in cpumask) and raises the following warning:
> 
>     WARN_ON(!cpumask_test_cpu(raw_smp_processor_id(), hctx->cpumask) &&
>             cpu_online(hctx->next_cpu));
> 
> To fix this problem, this patch modifies blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu()
> to only return a CPU id present in cpumask.

So, this one isn't needed either.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-21 14:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-21 13:49 [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/workqueue: update list of possible CPUs Laurent Vivier
2017-08-21 13:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] blk-mq: don't use WORK_CPU_UNBOUND Laurent Vivier
2017-08-21 14:48   ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2017-08-21 14:48 ` [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/workqueue: update list of possible CPUs Tejun Heo
2017-08-22  1:41   ` Michael Ellerman
2017-08-22 16:54     ` Tejun Heo
2017-08-23 11:00       ` Michael Ellerman
2017-08-23 11:17         ` Laurent Vivier
2017-08-23 13:26         ` Tejun Heo
2017-08-24 12:10           ` Laurent Vivier
2017-08-24 13:51             ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170821144855.GF491396@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.