From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: mst@redhat.com, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] virtio: Limit the retries on a virtio device reset
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 13:07:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170824130746.25f80368.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1503505982-29568-1-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Wed, 23 Aug 2017 18:33:02 +0200
Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Reseting a device can sometime fail, even a virtual device.
> If the device is not reseted after a while the driver should
> abandon the retries.
> This is the change proposed for the modern virtio_pci.
>
> More generally, when this happens,the virtio driver can set the
> VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_FAILED status flag to advertise the caller.
>
> The virtio core can test if the reset was succesful by testing
> this flag after a reset.
>
> This behavior is backward compatible with existing drivers.
> This behavior seems to me compatible with Virtio-1.0 specifications,
> Chapters 2.1 Device Status Field.
> There I definitively need your opinion: Is it right?
Will have to double check with the spec.
>
> This patch also lead to another question:
> do we care if a device provided by the hypervisor is buggy?
Getting into a hang because of a broken device is not nice, but I'm not
sure we need to plan for this. Have you seen this in the wild?
>
> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 4 ++++
> drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
> index 48230a5..6255dc4 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
> @@ -324,6 +324,8 @@ int register_virtio_device(struct virtio_device *dev)
> /* We always start by resetting the device, in case a previous
> * driver messed it up. This also tests that code path a little. */
> dev->config->reset(dev);
> + if (dev->config->get_status(dev) & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_FAILED)
> + return -EIO;
>
> /* Acknowledge that we've seen the device. */
> virtio_add_status(dev, VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_ACKNOWLEDGE);
> @@ -373,6 +375,8 @@ int virtio_device_restore(struct virtio_device *dev)
> /* We always start by resetting the device, in case a previous
> * driver messed it up. */
> dev->config->reset(dev);
> + if (dev->config->get_status(dev) & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_FAILED)
> + return -EIO;
virtio-ccw prior to rev 2 won't ever see this (as the read command did
not exist then), but this is not really a problem.
>
> /* Acknowledge that we've seen the device. */
> virtio_add_status(dev, VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_ACKNOWLEDGE);
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c
> index 2555d80..bfc5fc1 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c
> @@ -270,6 +270,7 @@ static void vp_set_status(struct virtio_device *vdev, u8 status)
> static void vp_reset(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> {
> struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev = to_vp_device(vdev);
> + int retry_count = 10;
When you're touching this anyway, it would be a good time to add an
extra blank line :)
> /* 0 status means a reset. */
> vp_iowrite8(0, &vp_dev->common->device_status);
> /* After writing 0 to device_status, the driver MUST wait for a read of
> @@ -277,8 +278,16 @@ static void vp_reset(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> * This will flush out the status write, and flush in device writes,
> * including MSI-X interrupts, if any.
> */
> - while (vp_ioread8(&vp_dev->common->device_status))
> + while (vp_ioread8(&vp_dev->common->device_status) && retry_count--)
> msleep(1);
> + /* If the read did not return 0 before the timeout consider that
> + * the device failed.
> + */
> + if (retry_count <= 0) {
> + virtio_add_status(vdev, VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_FAILED);
> + return;
> + }
> + virtio_add_status(vdev, VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_ACKNOWLEDGE);
Adding ACK here seems wrong?
> /* Flush pending VQ/configuration callbacks. */
> vp_synchronize_vectors(vdev);
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-24 11:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-23 16:33 [PATCH] [RFC] virtio: Limit the retries on a virtio device reset Pierre Morel
2017-08-24 11:07 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2017-08-24 12:16 ` Pierre Morel
2017-08-24 14:12 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-08-24 17:07 ` Pierre Morel
2017-08-24 21:16 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-08-25 8:26 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-08-25 11:21 ` Pierre Morel
2017-08-25 16:43 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-08-24 14:19 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-08-24 17:42 ` Pierre Morel
2017-08-24 21:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-08-25 8:33 ` Pierre Morel
2017-08-25 16:46 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170824130746.25f80368.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.