All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>
To: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>
Cc: "hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>,
	"jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"hare@suse.com" <hare@suse.com>,
	"jthumshirn@suse.de" <jthumshirn@suse.de>,
	"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	"brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve requeuing behavior
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 18:57:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170824165704.GA28901@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1503591261.2702.9.camel@wdc.com>

On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 04:14:22PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Commit ca18d6f769d2 ("block: Make most scsi_req_init() calls implicit")
> introduced the scsi_initialize_rq() function in such a way that it is not only
> called for pass-through requests but also for FS requests. Because that commit
> sets .initialize_rq_fn for both blk-sq and blk-mq blk_get_request() now calls
> scsi_initialize_rq() for all SCSI requests. Or did I perhaps overlook something?

initialize_rq_fn is only called from blk_get_request, which is not
called for normal file system read/write/flush/discard request.

Also unless my memory fails me that's something that I and Jens requested
to be changed from your original version.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-24 16:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-23 21:05 [PATCH] Improve requeuing behavior Bart Van Assche
2017-08-24 12:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-24 16:14   ` Bart Van Assche
2017-08-24 16:57     ` hch [this message]
2017-08-24 17:17       ` Bart Van Assche

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170824165704.GA28901@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com \
    --cc=brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.com \
    --cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=jthumshirn@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.