All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, jhs@mojatatu.com, fw@strlen.de
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next v2 3/4] net_sched: remove tc class reference counting
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 11:00:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170825090021.GA4829@nanopsycho> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170824235130.28503-4-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>

Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 01:51:29AM CEST, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com wrote:
>For TC classes, their ->get() and ->put() are always paired, and the
>reference counting is completely useless, because:
>
>1) For class modification and dumping paths, we already hold RTNL lock,
>   so all of these ->get(),->change(),->put() are atomic.

There is ongoing initiative by Florian to avoid taking RTNL for some
rtnetlink calls. I think that for dumping it could be done in tc as well.
Don't we need the refcnt then?


>
>2) For filter bindiing/unbinding, we use other reference counter than
>   this one, and they should have RTNL lock too.
>
>3) For ->qlen_notify(), it is special because it is called on ->enqueue()
>   path, but we already hold qdisc tree lock there, and we hold this
>   tree lock when graft or delete the class too, so it should not be gone
>   or changed until we release the tree lock.
>
>Therefore, this patch removes ->get() and ->put(), but:
>
>1) Adds a new ->find() to find the pointer to a class by classid, no
>   refcnt.
>
>2) Move the original class destroy upon the last refcnt into ->delete(),
>   right after releasing tree lock. This is fine because the class is
>   already removed from hash when holding the lock.
>
>For those who also use ->put() as ->unbind(), just rename them to reflect
>this change.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-25  9:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-24 23:51 [Patch net-next v2 0/4] net_sched: clean up tc classes and u32 filter Cong Wang
2017-08-24 23:51 ` [Patch net-next v2 1/4] net_sched: get rid of more forward declarations Cong Wang
2017-08-25  8:45   ` Jiri Pirko
2017-08-25 11:51   ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-08-24 23:51 ` [Patch net-next v2 2/4] net_sched: introduce tclass_del_notify() Cong Wang
2017-08-25  8:54   ` Jiri Pirko
2017-08-25 11:51   ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-08-24 23:51 ` [Patch net-next v2 3/4] net_sched: remove tc class reference counting Cong Wang
2017-08-25  9:00   ` Jiri Pirko [this message]
2017-08-25  9:18     ` Florian Westphal
2017-08-25  9:36       ` Jiri Pirko
2017-08-25  9:41   ` Jiri Pirko
2017-08-25 12:28   ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-08-24 23:51 ` [Patch net-next v2 4/4] net_sched: kill u32_node pointer in Qdisc Cong Wang
2017-08-25  9:06   ` Jiri Pirko
2017-08-25 12:29   ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-08-25 12:37     ` Jiri Pirko
2017-08-26  0:20 ` [Patch net-next v2 0/4] net_sched: clean up tc classes and u32 filter David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170825090021.GA4829@nanopsycho \
    --to=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.