From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: "Waskiewicz Jr, Peter" <peter.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com>
Cc: "Hu, Robert" <robert.hu@intel.com>,
"robert.hu@linux.intel.com" <robert.hu@linux.intel.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
brouer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pktgen: add a new sample script for 40G and above link testing
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 16:59:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170825165929.0d840ab2@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E0D909EE5BB15A4699798539EA149D7F077932D8@ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Fri, 25 Aug 2017 14:24:28 +0000
"Waskiewicz Jr, Peter" <peter.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com> wrote:
> On 8/25/17 5:19 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> >>
> >> Tested with Intel XL710 NIC with Cisco 3172 switch.
> >>
> >> It would be even slightly better if the irqbalance service is turned
> >> off outside.
> >
> > Yes, if you don't turn-off (kill) irqbalance it will move around the
> > IRQs behind your back...
>
> Or you can use the --banirq option to irqbalance to ignore your device's
> interrupts as targets for balancing.
It might be worth mentioning that --banirq=X is specified for each IRQ
that you want to exclude, and --banirq is simply specified multiple
times on the command line.
Is it possible to tell a running irqbalance that I want to excluded an
extra IRQ? (just before I do my manual adjustment).
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-25 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-25 2:24 [PATCH] pktgen: add a new sample script for 40G and above link testing Robert Hoo
2017-08-25 9:19 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-08-25 14:24 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter
2017-08-25 14:59 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2017-08-25 15:11 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter
2017-09-01 13:57 ` Robert Hoo
2017-09-01 13:48 ` Robert Hoo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-08-25 9:26 Robert Hoo
2017-08-25 9:47 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-08-27 8:25 ` Tariq Toukan
2017-09-01 13:53 ` Robert Hoo
2017-08-24 12:06 Robert Hoo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170825165929.0d840ab2@redhat.com \
--to=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com \
--cc=robert.hu@intel.com \
--cc=robert.hu@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.