From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42748) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dlNIM-0002BR-N0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 18:41:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dlNIJ-0007P9-LH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 18:41:42 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:39344) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dlNIJ-0007Oo-Ex for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 18:41:39 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB2957E423 for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 22:41:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 19:41:28 -0300 From: Eduardo Habkost Message-ID: <20170825224128.GO15315@localhost.localdomain> References: <20170823221445.15243-1-ehabkost@redhat.com> <20170823221445.15243-2-ehabkost@redhat.com> <20170825141900.08e2a089@w520.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170825141900.08e2a089@w520.home> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] pci: INTERFACE_LEGACY_PCI_DEVICE and INTERFACE_PCIE_DEVICE interfaces List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alex Williamson Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Marcel Apfelbaum , Laine Stump , "Michael S. Tsirkin" On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 02:19:00PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 23 Aug 2017 19:14:41 -0300 > Eduardo Habkost wrote: > > > Those two interfaces will be used to indicate which device types > > support legacy PCI or PCI-express buses. Management software > > will be able to use the qom-list-types QMP command to query that > > information. > > Nit, while "legacy PCI" and "conventional PCI" have about the same > number of google hits, I believe the latter is the more correct term. > The quality of hits is certainly a lot better with "conventional". > Calling something "legacy" also spurs an immediate negative reaction > for some folks, "conventional" is more neutral. Thanks, Oh, Conventional PCI even has a Wikipedia article. I agree. I will change it in v2. Thanks! -- Eduardo