All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>
Cc: "mingo@kernel.org" <mingo@kernel.org>,
	"jthumshirn@suse.de" <jthumshirn@suse.de>,
	"hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>,
	"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	"hare@suse.de" <hare@suse.de>,
	"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"shane.seymour@hpe.com" <shane.seymour@hpe.com>,
	"jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] rcu: Introduce rcu_swap_protected()
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 14:58:47 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170828215847.GE11320@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1503956357.2841.68.camel@wdc.com>

On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 09:39:18PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-08-28 at 14:26 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 01:46:13PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > > A common pattern in RCU code is to assign a new value to an RCU
> > > pointer after having read and stored the old value. Introduce a
> > > macro for this pattern.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
> > > Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> > > Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> > > Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
> > > Cc: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
> > > Cc: Shane M Seymour <shane.seymour@hpe.com>
> > > ---
> > >  include/linux/rcupdate.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> > > index f816fc72b51e..555815ce2e57 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> > > @@ -561,6 +561,26 @@ static inline void rcu_preempt_sleep_check(void) { }
> > >   */
> > >  #define rcu_pointer_handoff(p) (p)
> > > 
> > > +/**
> > > + * rcu_swap_protected() - swap an RCU and a regular pointer
> > > + * @rcu_ptr: RCU pointer
> > > + * @ptr: regular pointer
> > > + * @c: the conditions under which the dereference will take place
> > > + *
> > > + * Perform swap(@rcu_ptr, @ptr) where @rcu_ptr is an RCU-annotated pointer and
> > > + * @c is the argument that is passed to the rcu_dereference_protected() call
> > > + * used to read that pointer.
> > > + */
> > > +#define rcu_swap_protected(rcu_ptr, ptr, c) do {			\
> > > +	typeof(ptr) __tmp;						\
> > > +									\
> > > +	BUILD_BUG_ON(!__same_type(typeof(rcu_ptr), typeof(*(ptr)) __rcu *)); \
> > > +	BUILD_BUG_ON(!__same_type(typeof(ptr), typeof(*(rcu_ptr)) *));	\
> > 
> > Hmmm...
> > 
> > What kinds of bugs have these two BUILD_BUG_ON() instances have caught
> > that would not be caught by the assignments below?
> 
> Hello Paul,
> 
> These two BUILD_BUG_ON() statements can be left out. The purpose of these
> statements is to complain as early as possible if the type of rcu_ptr and/or
> ptr is incorrect. As we all know error messages that are triggered by macros
> used inside a macro definition can be hard to read. My hope is that these
> two BUILD_BUG_ON() macros will cause the compiler to report easier to read
> diagnostic messages.
> 
> > > +	__tmp = rcu_dereference_protected((rcu_ptr), (c));		\
> > > +	rcu_assign_pointer((rcu_ptr), (ptr));				\
> > > +	(ptr) = __tmp;							\
> > > +} while (0)
> > > +
> > 
> > Could you please put this after rcu_assign_pointer() and before
> > rcu_access_pointer()?  That way the things that assign to RCU-protected
> > pointers are together.
> 
> Something like the patch below (compile-tested only)?

Looks good!

I suspect that you would like to push this with your changes, so,
assuming 0day test robot and -next are OK with it:

Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

I am not necessarily inalterably opposed to the extra BUILD_BUG_ON()
statements, and in fact I do like improved diagnostics, but those need to
go up via my tree as a separate patch.  That way, any unexpected gotchas
can be handled without risking your rcu_swap_protected() functionality.

							Thanx, Paul

> Thanks,
> 
> Bart.
> 
> 
> [PATCH] rcu: Introduce rcu_swap_protected()
> ---
>  include/linux/rcupdate.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> index f816fc72b51e..8e920f0ecb07 100644
> --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> @@ -407,6 +407,22 @@ static inline void rcu_preempt_sleep_check(void) { }
>  	_r_a_p__v;							      \
>  })
>  
> +/**
> + * rcu_swap_protected() - swap an RCU and a regular pointer
> + * @rcu_ptr: RCU pointer
> + * @ptr: regular pointer
> + * @c: the conditions under which the dereference will take place
> + *
> + * Perform swap(@rcu_ptr, @ptr) where @rcu_ptr is an RCU-annotated pointer and
> + * @c is the argument that is passed to the rcu_dereference_protected() call
> + * used to read that pointer.
> + */
> +#define rcu_swap_protected(rcu_ptr, ptr, c) do {			\
> +	typeof(ptr) __tmp = rcu_dereference_protected((rcu_ptr), (c));	\
> +	rcu_assign_pointer((rcu_ptr), (ptr));				\
> +	(ptr) = __tmp;							\
> +} while (0)
> +
>  /**
>   * rcu_access_pointer() - fetch RCU pointer with no dereferencing
>   * @p: The pointer to read

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-28 21:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-28 20:46 [PATCH v3 0/3] Rework handling of scsi_device.vpd_pg8[03] Bart Van Assche
2017-08-28 20:46 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] rcu: Introduce rcu_swap_protected() Bart Van Assche
2017-08-28 21:26   ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-08-28 21:39     ` Bart Van Assche
2017-08-28 21:58       ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2017-08-28 20:46 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] Rework the code for caching Vital Product Data (VPD) Bart Van Assche
2017-08-28 20:46 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] Rework handling of scsi_device.vpd_pg8[03] Bart Van Assche
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-08-28 20:45 [PATCH v3 0/3] " Bart Van Assche
2017-08-28 20:45 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] rcu: Introduce rcu_swap_protected() Bart Van Assche
2017-08-28 20:45 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-08-28 20:44 [PATCH v3 0/3] Rework handling of scsi_device.vpd_pg8[03] Bart Van Assche
2017-08-28 20:44 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] rcu: Introduce rcu_swap_protected() Bart Van Assche
2017-08-28 20:44 ` Bart Van Assche

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170828215847.GE11320@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=jthumshirn@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=shane.seymour@hpe.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.