From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Tue, 29 Aug 2017 15:21:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:34299 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S23994931AbdH2NU5QJVYl (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Aug 2017 15:20:57 +0200 Received: by newverein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 052E068C5A; Tue, 29 Aug 2017 15:20:57 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 15:20:56 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Ralf Baechle Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mips: consolidate coherent and non-coherent dma_alloc code Message-ID: <20170829132056.GA30271@lst.de> References: <20170616071229.16954-1-hch@lst.de> <20170829125455.GB15640@linux-mips.org> <20170829125927.GA28540@lst.de> <20170829131833.GD22412@linux-mips.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170829131833.GD22412@linux-mips.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 59866 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: hch@lst.de Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 03:18:33PM +0200, Ralf Baechle wrote: > > > Your change essentially reverts a change from Oct 2007 so it should work. > > > > Which commit is that? I can't find anything that looks related in the > > Oct 2017 commits. > > Well, it predates the git history so it indeed is hard to find: > > https://git.linux-mips.org/cgit/ralf/linux.git/commit/?id=7ca16d269a1a4b96d98968b48f137977bcab1522 That looks like a different commit from a different series than the one you replied to. But I'll happily take the ACK for that one :)