From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 03/12] staging: wilc1000: simplify vif[i]->ndev accesses
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 17:44:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170831154239.058027538@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170831154238.914795784@linuxfoundation.org>
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
commit 735bb39ca3bed8469b3b3a42d8cc57bdb9fc4dd7 upstream.
With gcc-7, I got a new warning for this driver:
wilc1000/linux_wlan.c: In function 'wilc_netdev_cleanup':
wilc1000/linux_wlan.c:1224:15: error: 'vif[1]' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
wilc1000/linux_wlan.c:1224:15: error: 'vif[0]' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
A closer look at the function reveals that it's more complex than
it needs to be, given that based on how the device is created
we always get
netdev_priv(vif->ndev) == vif
Based on this assumption, I found a few other places in the same file
that can be simplified. That code appears to be a relic from times
when the assumption above was not valid.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/staging/wilc1000/linux_wlan.c | 34 +++++++++-------------------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/linux_wlan.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/linux_wlan.c
@@ -269,23 +269,12 @@ static struct net_device *get_if_handler
int wilc_wlan_set_bssid(struct net_device *wilc_netdev, u8 *bssid, u8 mode)
{
- int i = 0;
- int ret = -1;
- struct wilc_vif *vif;
- struct wilc *wilc;
-
- vif = netdev_priv(wilc_netdev);
- wilc = vif->wilc;
+ struct wilc_vif *vif = netdev_priv(wilc_netdev);
- for (i = 0; i < wilc->vif_num; i++)
- if (wilc->vif[i]->ndev == wilc_netdev) {
- memcpy(wilc->vif[i]->bssid, bssid, 6);
- wilc->vif[i]->mode = mode;
- ret = 0;
- break;
- }
+ memcpy(vif->bssid, bssid, 6);
+ vif->mode = mode;
- return ret;
+ return 0;
}
int wilc_wlan_get_num_conn_ifcs(struct wilc *wilc)
@@ -1212,16 +1201,11 @@ void WILC_WFI_mgmt_rx(struct wilc *wilc,
void wilc_netdev_cleanup(struct wilc *wilc)
{
- int i = 0;
- struct wilc_vif *vif[NUM_CONCURRENT_IFC];
+ int i;
- if (wilc && (wilc->vif[0]->ndev || wilc->vif[1]->ndev)) {
+ if (wilc && (wilc->vif[0]->ndev || wilc->vif[1]->ndev))
unregister_inetaddr_notifier(&g_dev_notifier);
- for (i = 0; i < NUM_CONCURRENT_IFC; i++)
- vif[i] = netdev_priv(wilc->vif[i]->ndev);
- }
-
if (wilc && wilc->firmware) {
release_firmware(wilc->firmware);
wilc->firmware = NULL;
@@ -1230,7 +1214,7 @@ void wilc_netdev_cleanup(struct wilc *wi
if (wilc && (wilc->vif[0]->ndev || wilc->vif[1]->ndev)) {
for (i = 0; i < NUM_CONCURRENT_IFC; i++)
if (wilc->vif[i]->ndev)
- if (vif[i]->mac_opened)
+ if (wilc->vif[i]->mac_opened)
wilc_mac_close(wilc->vif[i]->ndev);
for (i = 0; i < NUM_CONCURRENT_IFC; i++) {
@@ -1278,9 +1262,9 @@ int wilc_netdev_init(struct wilc **wilc,
vif->idx = wl->vif_num;
vif->wilc = *wilc;
+ vif->ndev = ndev;
wl->vif[i] = vif;
- wl->vif[wl->vif_num]->ndev = ndev;
- wl->vif_num++;
+ wl->vif_num = i;
ndev->netdev_ops = &wilc_netdev_ops;
{
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-31 15:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-31 15:44 [PATCH 4.9 00/12] 4.9.47-stable review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-08-31 15:44 ` [PATCH 4.9 01/12] p54: memset(0) whole array Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-08-31 16:40 ` Joe Perches
2017-09-02 15:51 ` Joe Perches
2017-09-03 12:32 ` Christian Lamparter
2017-09-03 15:07 ` Joe Perches
2017-09-03 15:07 ` Joe Perches
2017-08-31 15:44 ` [PATCH 4.9 02/12] scsi: isci: avoid array subscript warning Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-08-31 15:44 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2017-08-31 15:44 ` [PATCH 4.9 04/12] gcov: support GCC 7.1 Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-08-31 15:44 ` [PATCH 4.9 06/12] arm64: mm: abort uaccess retries upon fatal signal Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-08-31 15:44 ` [PATCH 4.9 08/12] arm64: fpsimd: Prevent registers leaking across exec Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-08-31 15:44 ` [PATCH 4.9 09/12] locking/spinlock/debug: Remove spinlock lockup detection code Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-08-31 15:44 ` [PATCH 4.9 10/12] scsi: sg: protect accesses to reserved page array Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-08-31 15:44 ` [PATCH 4.9 11/12] scsi: sg: reset res_in_use after unlinking reserved array Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-08-31 16:45 ` [PATCH 4.9 00/12] 4.9.47-stable review Sumit Semwal
2017-08-31 16:59 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-08-31 19:08 ` Shuah Khan
2017-09-01 5:02 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-09-01 2:32 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170831154239.058027538@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.