All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>,
	fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] fstests: regression test for xfs leftover CoW extent error
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2017 20:21:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170903182133.GA1757@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170903174513.GI4073@magnolia>

> So basically there are two bugs here -- the fcollapse/finsert code needs
> to shift the CoW fork extents down and up;

Or make sure that we don't have any extents in the COW fork?

> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> index 9207d61..ae3b18f 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> @@ -1625,7 +1625,7 @@ xfs_itruncate_extents(
>         /*
>          * Clear the reflink flag if we truncated everything.
>          */
> -       if (ip->i_d.di_nblocks == 0 && xfs_is_reflink_inode(ip)) {
> +       if (ip->i_d.di_nblocks == 0 && ip->i_cnextents == 0 && xfs_is_reflink_inode(ip)) {

Btw, it seems like we should generally clear the reflink flag and
tag if ip->i_cnextents is zero and not even bother looking at di_nblocks.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-03 18:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-03 15:07 [RFC][PATCH] fstests: regression test for xfs leftover CoW extent error Amir Goldstein
2017-09-03 17:45 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-09-03 18:21   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2017-09-03 21:04     ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-09-04  7:31       ` Amir Goldstein
2017-09-04 15:30       ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-04 15:46         ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170903182133.GA1757@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=eguan@redhat.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.