From: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Tim McDaniel <timothy.mcdaniel@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] eventdev: update doxygen
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 11:42:09 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170906061208.GA2883@jerin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1504646088-3476-1-git-send-email-timothy.mcdaniel@intel.com>
-----Original Message-----
> Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2017 16:14:48 -0500
> From: Tim McDaniel <timothy.mcdaniel@intel.com>
> To: jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com
> CC: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [PATCH] eventdev: update doxygen
It is better to update the log message with more appropriate comment.
Something like eventdev: clarify .... usage
> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4
>
> Update doxygen to make it clear that RTE_EVENT_OP_FORWARD and
> RTE_EVENT_OP_RELEASE may only be enqueued to the same port that the
> original event was dequeued from.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tim McDaniel <timothy.mcdaniel@intel.com>
> ---
> lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.h | 14 +++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.h b/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.h
> index 128bc52..117eeb0 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.h
> @@ -882,7 +882,10 @@ rte_event_dev_close(uint8_t dev_id);
> #define RTE_EVENT_OP_FORWARD 1
> /**< The CPU use this operation to forward the event to different event queue or
> * change to new application specific flow or schedule type to enable
> - * pipelining
> + * pipelining.
> + *
> + * RTE_EVENT_OP_FORWARD must only be enqueued to the same port that the
This text is under RTE_EVENT_OP_FORWARD. IMO, No need to explicitly
mention the RTE_EVENT_OP_FORWARD again. Other than that the content looks good.
> + * event to be forwarded was dequeued from.
> */
> #define RTE_EVENT_OP_RELEASE 2
> /**< Release the flow context associated with the schedule type.
> @@ -912,6 +915,9 @@ rte_event_dev_close(uint8_t dev_id);
> * or no scheduling context is held then this function may be an NOOP,
> * depending on the implementation.
> *
> + * RTE_EVENT_OP_RELEASE must only be enqueued to the same port that the
> + * event to be released was dequeued from.
Same as above.
With above changes:
Acked-by: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-06 6:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-05 21:14 [PATCH] eventdev: update doxygen Tim McDaniel
2017-09-06 6:12 ` Jerin Jacob [this message]
2017-09-06 15:42 ` [PATCH v2] eventdev: clarify usage of forward and release ops Tim McDaniel
2017-09-11 8:29 ` Jerin Jacob
2017-09-15 12:44 ` Jerin Jacob
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170906061208.GA2883@jerin \
--to=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=timothy.mcdaniel@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.