From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefano Brivio Subject: Re: [PATCH] lpfc: Don't return internal MBXERR_ERROR code from probe function Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 10:47:38 +0200 Message-ID: <20170906104738.50b81cd5@elisabeth> References: <20170906103222.538c07b2@elisabeth> <20170906084235.n22ll6z7pnvi6t3q@linux-x5ow.site> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34508 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750832AbdIFIro (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Sep 2017 04:47:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20170906084235.n22ll6z7pnvi6t3q@linux-x5ow.site> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Thumshirn Cc: Dick Kennedy , James Smart , QLogic-Storage-Upstream@cavium.com, Maurizio Lombardi , martin.petersen@oracle.com, "James E . J . Bottomley" , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 10:42:35 +0200 Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 10:32:22AM +0200, Stefano Brivio wrote: > > > > I didn't get feedback about this patch. Is there any issue with the > > submission? > > > > I think it actually fixes a quite critical issue, if initialization > > fails we have crashes on reboot like the one reported below [1], and > > should perhaps also be queued for -stable. > > It seems to have slipped trough the cracks, can you please re-submit? The original submission is archived at https://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=150392554622786&w=2. Before I cause any confusion... do you want me to re-submit this with the same subject? As v2 with a comment? -- Stefano