From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 15:19:13 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Convert pr_warning to standard pr_warn In-Reply-To: <20170906092125.GA23268@leverpostej> References: <1504578518-77544-1-git-send-email-cj.chengjian@huawei.com> <20170905091051.GA4401@leverpostej> <1504636703.28899.9.camel@perches.com> <20170906092125.GA23268@leverpostej> Message-ID: <20170906141913.avg2gw437mkowyl6@localhost> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 10:21:26AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 11:38:23AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Tue, 2017-09-05 at 10:10 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 10:28:38AM +0800, chengjian c00427203 wrote: > > > > Convert pr_warning to standard pr_warn in arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Cheng Jian > > > > --- > > > > arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 4 ++-- > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > Is this a step towards removing pr_warning entirely? > > > > > > If so, can you please fix up all occurences in arm64? i.e. > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9578907/ > > Ah, I thought I'd seen this before. :) > > Catalin, Will, are you happy with Joe's patch? Yes, though I thought they'd go in via other tree (e.g. kernel-janitors). -- Catalin From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754693AbdIFOTW (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Sep 2017 10:19:22 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:51590 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751236AbdIFOTT (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Sep 2017 10:19:19 -0400 Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 15:19:13 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas To: Mark Rutland Cc: Joe Perches , chengjian c00427203 , will.deacon@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, huawei.libin@huawei.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mingo@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Convert pr_warning to standard pr_warn Message-ID: <20170906141913.avg2gw437mkowyl6@localhost> References: <1504578518-77544-1-git-send-email-cj.chengjian@huawei.com> <20170905091051.GA4401@leverpostej> <1504636703.28899.9.camel@perches.com> <20170906092125.GA23268@leverpostej> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170906092125.GA23268@leverpostej> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 10:21:26AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 11:38:23AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Tue, 2017-09-05 at 10:10 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 10:28:38AM +0800, chengjian c00427203 wrote: > > > > Convert pr_warning to standard pr_warn in arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Cheng Jian > > > > --- > > > > arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 4 ++-- > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > Is this a step towards removing pr_warning entirely? > > > > > > If so, can you please fix up all occurences in arm64? i.e. > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9578907/ > > Ah, I thought I'd seen this before. :) > > Catalin, Will, are you happy with Joe's patch? Yes, though I thought they'd go in via other tree (e.g. kernel-janitors). -- Catalin