From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=SrkK=AL=h08.hostsharing.net=foo00@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2017 20:43:15 +0200
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Daniel Mack <daniel@zonque.org>,
	Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
	Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>,
	"Andrew F. Davis" <afd@ti.com>,
	Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drivers: misc: ti_dac7512: Remove duplicate driver
Message-ID: <20170910184315.GA13239@wunner.de>
References: <be82f31ef2f0f39c7893b42dfe46c7235ea6144a.1504604178.git.lukas@wunner.de>
 <d5a12cb12480235e05315e9c8fa6e8b5f5a3dfb6.1504604178.git.lukas@wunner.de>
 <CAK8P3a2L+wOER7LwXApD_YrVA7Zi9D96FZC5zAm_+aSy+qG0rg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170905101144.GA23808@wunner.de>
 <524a1c8e-93c1-d905-dc39-b154290beb86@zonque.org>
 <CAK8P3a1XQBLsSmkKK75P1y6h8925L3K68v_5ARoBbEyLu3q_Fw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170910161928.2b49d134@archlinux>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <20170910161928.2b49d134@archlinux>
List-ID: <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>

On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 04:19:28PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 15:01:08 +0200 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 12:28 PM, Daniel Mack <daniel@zonque.org> wrote:
> > > That's true, but the devices that do are EOL for a long time, and they
> > > don't use mainline kernels anyway, for multiple reasons. So that
> > > shouldn't constrain us, and I'm all for replacing that driver with
> > > something that has a real infrastructure.
> > >
> > >   Acked-by: Daniel Mack <daniel@zonque.org>  
> > 
> > Ok, thanks for the confirmation. That's probably good enough to apply the
> > patch for 4.15. If someone else uses the driver without you knowing, they
> > can always complain later on and we revert the patch or think of an
> > alternative, but that seems unlikely.
> 
> Sounds good to me.  I'll pick it up through IIO given the small changes
> there and the fact you are happy with it.  Shout if you would prefer
> a different route. Given timing I won't be pushing this out on a non
> rebasing tree for a week or so anyway.
> 
> Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing for
> autobuilders to play with it.

Thank you Daniel, Arnd & Jonathan!

A minor note, the commit as pushed to iio.git/testing is missing Arnd's
Acked-by.  Also, the Cc: to Daniel is redundant given his ack.

Have a pleasant week,

Lukas