All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Dong Jia Shi <bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] s390x/css: drop data-check in interpretation
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 11:33:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170911113314.45ef089e.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170908152446.14606-2-pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Fri,  8 Sep 2017 17:24:43 +0200
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> The architecture says that channel-data check is indicating that
> an uncorrected storage (memory) error has been detected in regard
> to the data residing in main storage (memory) that is currently
> used for an I/O operation. The described detection is done using
> the CBC technology.
> 
> The ccw interpretation code is however generating a channel-data check
> effectively when the (device specific) ccw_cb returns -EFAULT.  In case
> of virtio-ccw devices this happens when mapping memory fails, or when a
> NULL pointer is encountered. So this behavior is not architecture
> conform.
> 
> Furthermore the best fit for these situations (null pointer, mapping a
> piece of guest memory fails) from architectural perspective the condition
> described as the channel subsystem refers to a location that is not
> available, which when encountered shall result in a channel-program
> check.
> 
> To fix this, all we have to do is to get rid of the switch case matching
> -EFAULT: the default is generating a channel-program check.
> 
> ---
> 
> Was posted as stand alone patch. See:
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/810995/
> 
> If you are going to, *please review there*.

Countered. *Please review here*

(It makes it easier for me.)

> 
> Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Your s-o-b should go before the triple-dash delimiter. I can fix that
up.

> ---
>  hw/s390x/css.c | 9 ---------
>  1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/css.c b/hw/s390x/css.c
> index 901dc6a0f3..09f6ba0310 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/css.c
> +++ b/hw/s390x/css.c
> @@ -980,15 +980,6 @@ static void sch_handle_start_func_virtual(SubchDev *sch)
>                      SCSW_STCTL_ALERT | SCSW_STCTL_STATUS_PEND;
>              s->cpa = sch->channel_prog + 8;
>              break;
> -        case -EFAULT:
> -            /* memory problem, generate channel data check */
> -            s->ctrl &= ~SCSW_ACTL_START_PEND;
> -            s->cstat = SCSW_CSTAT_DATA_CHECK;
> -            s->ctrl &= ~SCSW_CTRL_MASK_STCTL;
> -            s->ctrl |= SCSW_STCTL_PRIMARY | SCSW_STCTL_SECONDARY |
> -                    SCSW_STCTL_ALERT | SCSW_STCTL_STATUS_PEND;
> -            s->cpa = sch->channel_prog + 8;
> -            break;
>          case -EBUSY:
>              /* subchannel busy, generate deferred cc 1 */
>              s->flags &= ~SCSW_FLAGS_MASK_CC;

Looks reasonable. Queued.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-11  9:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-08 15:24 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] s390x/css: ccw interpretation fixes Halil Pasic
2017-09-08 15:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] s390x/css: drop data-check in interpretation Halil Pasic
2017-09-11  9:33   ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2017-09-11 13:15     ` Halil Pasic
2017-09-08 15:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] s390x/css: fix NULL handling for CCW addresses Halil Pasic
2017-09-11  9:44   ` Cornelia Huck
2017-09-08 15:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] s390x/css: remove dubious error handling branch Halil Pasic
2017-09-11  9:48   ` Cornelia Huck
2017-09-11 13:08     ` Halil Pasic
2017-09-12 14:05       ` Cornelia Huck
2017-09-08 15:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] s390x/css: fix incorrect length indication Halil Pasic
2017-09-11 10:07   ` Cornelia Huck
2017-09-11 11:36     ` Halil Pasic
2017-09-12 14:37       ` Cornelia Huck
2017-09-12 15:43         ` Halil Pasic
2017-09-12 15:59           ` Cornelia Huck
2017-09-12 17:19             ` Halil Pasic
2017-09-13  9:27               ` Cornelia Huck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170911113314.45ef089e.cohuck@redhat.com \
    --to=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.