From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Snitzer Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] block: directly insert blk-mq request from blk_insert_cloned_request() Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 18:30:06 -0400 Message-ID: <20170911223006.GA17742@redhat.com> References: <20170908195805.GA30517@redhat.com> <57b4bb39-f50c-ad5e-d47d-01f0f84ec3ca@kernel.dk> <20170908214236.GA49918@redhat.com> <49cc6184-48da-2a45-e50e-13430e14e197@kernel.dk> <20170908220318.GA31120@redhat.com> <20170911161647.GA55061@redhat.com> <79287d3a-62e0-912e-dcad-e7ab5297ae34@kernel.dk> <20170911211327.GA17344@redhat.com> <20170911215134.GA17547@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170911215134.GA17547@redhat.com> Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jens Axboe Cc: Paolo Valente , Bart Van Assche , "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" , dm-devel@redhat.com List-Id: dm-devel.ids On Mon, Sep 11 2017 at 5:51pm -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote: > On Mon, Sep 11 2017 at 5:27pm -0400, > Jens Axboe wrote: > > > > Does the below work for you? > > I _will_ test your patch and let you know! Tested with bfq on underlying paths and both none and bfq on upper-level DM multipath request_queue. Works perfectly, feel free to add my: Tested-by: Mike Snitzer Thanks again!