From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bjorn Andersson Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] soc: qcom: smem: Rename "uncached" accessors Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 15:36:43 -0700 Message-ID: <20170915223643.GT2016@tuxbook> References: <20170814214922.18061-1-bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> <20170814214922.18061-2-bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> <20170915191934.GE3349@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170915191934.GE3349@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Boyd Cc: Andy Gross , David Brown , Arun Kumar Neelakantam , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On Fri 15 Sep 12:19 PDT 2017, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 08/14, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > In preparation for adding accessors for "cached" entries rename the > > "uncached" accessors to. Also rename "first" cached entry to "last", as > > s/to/too? or to "uncached"? > Doesn't it make more sense if we ju just make it: rename the "uncached" accessors? I.e just drop the "to". > > the cached list grows backwards. > > > > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson > > > Otherwise, > > Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd > Thanks, Bjorn