diff for duplicates of <20170917073705.GC19716@kozik-book> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index b709d3f..943a99f 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 03:41:18PM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote: > by scaling them so that the Cortex-A15s (big cores) use 1024. > > The cpu_efficiency values were originally derived from the "Big.LITTLE -> Processing with ARM Cortex™-A15 & Cortex-A7" white paper +> Processing with ARM Cortex?-A15 & Cortex-A7" white paper > (http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rdm34/big.LITTLE.pdf). Table 1 lists 1.9x > (3891/2048) as the Cortex-A15 vs Cortex-A7 performance ratio for the > Dhrystone benchmark. @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 03:41:18PM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote: > > The Cortex-A15 vs Cortex-A7 performance ratio is 2.39, i.e. very close > to the one derived from the Dhrystone based one of the "Big.LITTLE -> Processing with ARM Cortex™-A15 & Cortex-A7" white paper (2.63). +> Processing with ARM Cortex?-A15 & Cortex-A7" white paper (2.63). > > We don't aim for exact values for the cpu capacity values. Besides the > CPI (Cycles Per Instruction), the instruction mix and whether the system diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 53c7be0..64ed6c7 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -1,20 +1,9 @@ "ref\020170830144120.9312-1-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com\0" "ref\020170830144120.9312-3-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com\0" - "From\0Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 2/4] arm: dts: exynos: add exynos5420 cpu capacity-dmips-mhz information\0" + "From\0krzk@kernel.org (Krzysztof Kozlowski)\0" + "Subject\0[PATCH 2/4] arm: dts: exynos: add exynos5420 cpu capacity-dmips-mhz information\0" "Date\0Sun, 17 Sep 2017 09:37:05 +0200\0" - "To\0Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>\0" - "Cc\0linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" - linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org - devicetree@vger.kernel.org - linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org - linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org - Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> - Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> - Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> - Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> - " Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>\0" + "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 03:41:18PM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:\n" @@ -29,7 +18,7 @@ "> by scaling them so that the Cortex-A15s (big cores) use 1024.\n" "> \n" "> The cpu_efficiency values were originally derived from the \"Big.LITTLE\n" - "> Processing with ARM Cortex\342\204\242-A15 & Cortex-A7\" white paper\n" + "> Processing with ARM Cortex?-A15 & Cortex-A7\" white paper\n" "> (http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rdm34/big.LITTLE.pdf). Table 1 lists 1.9x\n" "> (3891/2048) as the Cortex-A15 vs Cortex-A7 performance ratio for the\n" "> Dhrystone benchmark.\n" @@ -106,7 +95,7 @@ "> \n" "> The Cortex-A15 vs Cortex-A7 performance ratio is 2.39, i.e. very close\n" "> to the one derived from the Dhrystone based one of the \"Big.LITTLE\n" - "> Processing with ARM Cortex\342\204\242-A15 & Cortex-A7\" white paper (2.63).\n" + "> Processing with ARM Cortex?-A15 & Cortex-A7\" white paper (2.63).\n" "> \n" "> We don't aim for exact values for the cpu capacity values. Besides the\n" "> CPI (Cycles Per Instruction), the instruction mix and whether the system\n" @@ -129,4 +118,4 @@ "Best regards,\n" Krzysztof -f19cb938c0125e5f46048d7cd1acf3cbf1a575a5abaabd0e1088a4e0a5267e9f +a5028d0a1c84b28386715edcade805bb12df4e82c655500977da84a89ff7d647
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.