All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>
Cc: "hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>,
	"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	"axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] blk-mq: Fix lost request during timeout
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 19:08:03 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170918230803.GB4671@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1505775191.12701.20.camel@wdc.com>

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:53:12PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-09-18 at 18:39 -0400, Keith Busch wrote:
> > The nvme driver's use of blk_mq_reinit_tagset only happens during
> > controller initialisation, but I'm seeing lost commands well after that
> > during normal and stable running.
> > 
> > The timing is pretty narrow to hit, but I'm pretty sure this is what's
> > happening. For nvme, this occurs when nvme_timeout() runs concurrently
> > with nvme_handle_cqe() for the same struct request. For scsi-mq,
> > the same situation may arise if scsi_mq_done() runs concurrently with
> > scsi_times_out().
> 
> Hello Keith,
> 
> Are you sure that scenario can happen? The blk-mq core calls test_and_set_bit()
> for the REQ_ATOM_COMPLETE flag before any completion or timeout handler is
> called. See also blk_mark_rq_complete(). This avoids that the .complete() and
> .timeout() functions run concurrently.

Indeed that prevents .complete from running concurrently with the
timeout handler, but scsi_mq_done and nvme_handle_cqe are not .complete
callbacks. These are the LLD functions that call blk_mq_complete_request
well before .complete. If the driver calls blk_mq_complete_request on
a request that blk-mq is timing out, the request is lost because blk-mq
already called blk_mark_rq_complete. Nothing prevents these LLD functions
from running at the same time as the timeout handler.
 
> In case this wouldn't be clear, a block driver must not call
> blk_mq_end_request() after the timeout handler has finished because that would
> trigger a use-after-free of a request structure.
>
> I noticed that your patch includes changes for blk_mq_start_request(). No
> timeout or completion handler should be running while blk_mq_start_request() is
> being executed. If these changes make a difference in your tests then I think
> that means that there is something wrong with the NVMe driver.

The reason for changing blk_mq_start_request was because of how the
requeue was clearing STARTED. I had to remove that since it would have
otherwise been impossible for the blk_mq_rq_timed_out to know if the
request was requeued vs. completed.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-18 23:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-18 22:03 [RFC PATCH] blk-mq: Fix lost request during timeout Keith Busch
2017-09-18 22:07 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-18 22:39   ` Keith Busch
2017-09-18 22:53     ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-18 23:08       ` Keith Busch [this message]
2017-09-18 23:14         ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19  1:55           ` Keith Busch
2017-09-19 15:05             ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19  4:16         ` Ming Lei
2017-09-19 15:07           ` Keith Busch
2017-09-19 15:18             ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 16:39               ` Keith Busch
2017-09-19 15:22             ` Ming Lei
2017-09-19 16:00               ` Keith Busch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170918230803.GB4671@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.