From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] soc: qcom: smem: Rename "uncached" accessors Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 22:38:56 -0700 Message-ID: <20170919053856.GG3349@codeaurora.org> References: <20170814214922.18061-1-bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> <20170814214922.18061-2-bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> <20170915191934.GE3349@codeaurora.org> <20170915223643.GT2016@tuxbook> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:52248 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750867AbdISFjD (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Sep 2017 01:39:03 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170915223643.GT2016@tuxbook> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: Bjorn Andersson Cc: Andy Gross , David Brown , Arun Kumar Neelakantam , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/15, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Fri 15 Sep 12:19 PDT 2017, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > On 08/14, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > > In preparation for adding accessors for "cached" entries rename the > > > "uncached" accessors to. Also rename "first" cached entry to "last", as > > > > s/to/too? or to "uncached"? > > > > Doesn't it make more sense if we ju just make it: rename the "uncached" > accessors? I.e just drop the "to". > Yes. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project