From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com>
Cc: acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org,
Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>,
Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/13] perf report: create real callchain entries for inlined frames
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 14:27:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170919122719.GB13388@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170906135501.306-4-milian.wolff@kdab.com>
On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 03:54:51PM +0200, Milian Wolff wrote:
SNIP
> +void inlines__tree_insert(struct rb_root *tree, struct inline_node *inlines)
> +{
> + struct rb_node **p = &tree->rb_node;
> + struct rb_node *parent = NULL;
> + const u64 addr = inlines->addr;
> + struct inline_node *i;
> +
> + while (*p != NULL) {
> + parent = *p;
> + i = rb_entry(parent, struct inline_node, rb_node);
> + if (addr < i->addr)
> + p = &(*p)->rb_left;
> + else
> + p = &(*p)->rb_right;
> + }
> + rb_link_node(&inlines->rb_node, parent, p);
> + rb_insert_color(&inlines->rb_node, tree);
> +}
> +
> +struct inline_node *inlines__tree_find(struct rb_root *tree, u64 addr)
> +{
> + struct rb_node *n = tree->rb_node;
> +
> + while (n) {
> + struct inline_node *i = rb_entry(n, struct inline_node,
> + rb_node);
> +
> + if (addr < i->addr)
> + n = n->rb_left;
> + else if (addr > i->addr)
> + n = n->rb_right;
> + else
> + return i;
> + }
> +
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +void inlines__tree_delete(struct rb_root *tree)
> +{
> + struct inline_node *pos;
> + struct rb_node *next = rb_first(tree);
> +
> + while (next) {
> + pos = rb_entry(next, struct inline_node, rb_node);
> + next = rb_next(&pos->rb_node);
> + rb_erase(&pos->rb_node, tree);
> + inline_node__delete(pos);
> + }
> +}
could you please split the patch at least into
above 'adding related inline_node tree managing functions + append_inlines'
and below 'struct inline_list' changes
not sure the 'struct symbol::inlined' could be separated,
I'd take it as a bonus and nice gesture to reviewers ;-)
thanks,
jirka
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/srcline.h b/tools/perf/util/srcline.h
> index 7b52ba88676e..0d2aca92e8c7 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/srcline.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/srcline.h
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> #define PERF_SRCLINE_H
>
> #include <linux/list.h>
> +#include <linux/rbtree.h>
> #include <linux/types.h>
>
> struct dso;
> @@ -17,18 +18,28 @@ void free_srcline(char *srcline);
> #define SRCLINE_UNKNOWN ((char *) "??:0")
>
> struct inline_list {
> - char *filename;
> - char *funcname;
> - unsigned int line_nr;
> + struct symbol *symbol;
> + char *srcline;
> struct list_head list;
> };
>
> struct inline_node {
> u64 addr;
> struct list_head val;
> + struct rb_node rb_node;
> };
>
> -struct inline_node *dso__parse_addr_inlines(struct dso *dso, u64 addr);
> +// parse inlined frames for the given address
> +struct inline_node *dso__parse_addr_inlines(struct dso *dso, u64 addr,
> + struct symbol *sym);
> +// free resources associated to the inline node list
> void inline_node__delete(struct inline_node *node);
>
> +// insert the inline node list into the DSO, which will take ownership
> +void inlines__tree_insert(struct rb_root *tree, struct inline_node *inlines);
> +// find previously inserted inline node list
> +struct inline_node *inlines__tree_find(struct rb_root *tree, u64 addr);
> +// delete all nodes within the tree of inline_node s
> +void inlines__tree_delete(struct rb_root *tree);
> +
> #endif /* PERF_SRCLINE_H */
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/symbol.h b/tools/perf/util/symbol.h
> index 2bd6a1f01a1c..8f072c28b6d3 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/symbol.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/symbol.h
> @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ struct symbol {
> u8 binding;
> u8 idle:1;
> u8 ignore:1;
> + u8 inlined:1;
> u8 arch_sym;
> char name[0];
> };
> --
> 2.14.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-19 12:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-06 13:54 [PATCH v3 00/13] generate full callchain cursor entries for inlined frames Milian Wolff
2017-09-06 13:54 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] perf report: remove code to handle inline frames from browsers Milian Wolff
2017-09-18 11:56 ` Jiri Olsa
2017-09-18 12:43 ` Milian Wolff
2017-09-06 13:54 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] perf util: store srcline in callchain_cursor_node Milian Wolff
2017-09-06 13:54 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] perf report: create real callchain entries for inlined frames Milian Wolff
2017-09-19 12:27 ` Jiri Olsa
2017-10-01 12:37 ` Milian Wolff
2017-10-01 17:40 ` Joe Perches
2017-09-19 12:27 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2017-10-01 14:12 ` Milian Wolff
2017-09-19 12:27 ` Jiri Olsa
2017-10-01 12:40 ` Milian Wolff
2017-09-06 13:54 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] perf report: fall-back to function name comparison for -g srcline Milian Wolff
2017-09-06 13:54 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] perf report: mark inlined frames in output by " (inlined)" suffix Milian Wolff
2017-09-06 13:54 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] perf script: mark inlined frames and do not print DSO for them Milian Wolff
2017-09-06 13:54 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] perf report: compare symbol name for inlined frames when matching Milian Wolff
2017-09-06 13:54 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] perf report: compare symbol name for inlined frames when sorting Milian Wolff
2017-09-06 13:54 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] perf report: properly handle branch count in match_chain Milian Wolff
2017-09-06 13:54 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] perf report: cache failed lookups of inlined frames Milian Wolff
2017-09-06 13:54 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] perf report: cache srclines for callchain nodes Milian Wolff
2017-09-06 13:55 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] perf report: use srcline from callchain for hist entries Milian Wolff
2017-09-06 13:55 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] perf util: enable handling of inlined frames by default Milian Wolff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170919122719.GB13388@krava \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=milian.wolff@kdab.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.